[LAU] Affordable well-working USB interface with low latency at 48kHz?

[Will Godfrey]

On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 14:55:10 +0100
David Kastrup <dak at gnu.org> wrote:

>David Kastrup <dak at gnu.org> writes:
<some snippage>
>Question: is there a reason that you are going with buffer sizes of
>3*2^n rather than 2^n?  I've not actually tried what Jamulus does in
>that situation (but will do) but it seems a bit strange to me.  Does it
>have some inherent advantage?

This puzzled me too. I was under the impression that the reason for using powers
of 2 was that buffering code was more efficient. Presumably that would give the
best latency figures.

-- 
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.