14 Jun
2009
14 Jun
'09
8:43 p.m.
i'd be willing to join the effort - if somebody
else produces the
content itself, i can help with mastering to surround.
What kind of content are they looking for? I thought they didn't
advertise needing help and got someone else to do the sound for the
previous two films. I'd be glad to help, where I can. Content is
probably where I'd be the most help.
-Mike
2009/6/14 Jörn Nettingsmeier <nettings(a)folkwang-hochschule.de>de>:
mike clemow wrote:
--
http://michaelclemow.com
http://semiotech.org
Hi Daniel,
You can't do that in Ardour? I've honestly never tried to do any 5.1
work, but I imagine that even if you had to go outboard for the mix,
it wouldn't be that hard. I guess they're doing what they think is
best. But I think that their decision might be based on something
other than a lack of open audio tools. I'm probably biased... ;-)
-Mike
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Daniel James<daniel(a)64studio.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
>> But there are so many good, open audio tools... as we know.
> I understand that one roadblock with previous projects was the need for a
> 5.1 mixdown of the soundtrack.
real men use ambisonics ;)
for the unwashed masses, they pre-render to 5.1.
ardour can do the former today, and ambdec will take care of the latter.
i'd be willing to join the effort - if somebody else produces the
content itself, i can help with mastering to surround. it would be 5.0,
though. imnsho, the .1 is one of the stupidest ideas ever...