20 Sep
2004
20 Sep
'04
2 p.m.
Hi Sili,
Please forgive me for my english.
No need - your English is fine.
For audio stuff we should stop crusade. We should
choose
one GUI paltform.
I'm inclined to agree. I know a lot of people are choosing Fluxbox
because of the low resource overhead.
I saw only two application that runs on any linux
distro with easy
installation without using make, configure etc and spending time to
install additional libraries if required (Netscape and openoffice).
Perhaps they were static binaries, with all the libraries compiled in.
Although that's a good way to make sure an application will install
without dependencies, I don't think it's particularly efficient. In
my view, the best solution is a robust package management system such
as apt or urpmi. Apt is used by both DeMuDi and Planet CCRMA at home,
while Thac's RPMs for Mandrake uses urpmi.
You should seriously
consider what i wrote above as future standards for audio
application listed in distros.
While there is the freedesktop.org initiative for general users, I
don't think anyone has attempted to set compatibility standards for
Linux audio workstations. At the moment, I'd expect that most of the
adaptation work is falling on the binary package maintainers.
Its time to do right thing and not
just talking about it.
I'm in 100% agreement with you there!
Cheers
Daniel
28 Sep
28 Sep
9:04 p.m.
New subject: Linux audio workstations
Sorry guys,
but I think I missed the initial part of this thread - I can't
understand what the problem is.
Can someone point me in the right direction?
Bye,
andrea
>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel James
<daniel(a)linuxaudio.org> writes:
Hi Sili,
> Please forgive me for my english.
No need - your English is fine.
> For audio stuff we should stop crusade. We should
choose one
> GUI paltform.
I'm inclined to agree. I know a lot of people are
choosing
Fluxbox because of the low resource overhead.
> I saw only two application that runs on any linux
distro with
> easy installation without using make, configure etc and
> spending time to install additional libraries if required
> (Netscape and openoffice).
Perhaps they were static binaries, with all the
libraries
compiled in. Although that's a good way to make sure an
application will install without dependencies, I don't think
it's particularly efficient. In my view, the best solution is a
robust package management system such as apt or urpmi. Apt is
used by both DeMuDi and Planet CCRMA at home, while Thac's RPMs
for Mandrake uses urpmi.
> You should seriously consider what i wrote above
as future
> standards for audio application listed in distros.
While there is the freedesktop.org initiative for
general users,
I don't think anyone has attempted to set compatibility
standards for Linux audio workstations. At the moment, I'd
expect that most of the adaptation work is falling on the binary
package maintainers.
> Its time to do right thing and not just talking
about it.
I'm in 100% agreement with you there!
Cheers
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Consortium
mailing list Consortium(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.agnula.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/consortium
--
Andrea Glorioso sama(a)miu-ft.org +39 333 820 5723
.:: Media Innovation Unit - Firenze Tecnologia ::.
Conquering the world for fun and profit
29 Sep
29 Sep
1:01 p.m.
New subject: Linux audio workstations
On Tuesday 28 Sep 2004 6:11 pm, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
I think I missed the initial part of this thread - I
can't
understand what the problem is.
Sili wrote to me with his experiences of using Linux audio software
and his suggestions for improvements, and I cc'd my reply to the
list.
Cheers
Daniel
30 Sep
30 Sep
1:23 p.m.
New subject: Linux audio workstations
>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel James
<daniel(a)linuxaudio.org> writes:
On Tuesday 28 Sep 2004 6:11 pm, Andrea Glorioso
wrote:
> I think I missed the initial part of this thread - I can't
> understand what the problem is.
Sili wrote to me with his experiences of using Linux
audio
software and his suggestions for improvements, and I cc'd my
reply to the list.
Oh, thanks. I just couldn't understand what the problem was (I
probably don't now, either).
Bye,
--
Andrea Glorioso sama(a)miu-ft.org +39 333 820 5723
.:: Media Innovation Unit - Firenze Tecnologia ::.
Conquering the world for fun and profit
4:54 p.m.
New subject: Linux audio workstations
Hello there!
Here is Attila Sili.
I decided to subscribe on linuxaudio list so its easier for messaging.
I wrote an email to Daniel my view about how the linux audio
workstation should work.
Attila
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel James <daniel(a)linuxaudio.org> writes:
On Tuesday 28 Sep 2004 6:11 pm, Andrea Glorioso
wrote:
> I think I missed the initial part of this thread - I can't
> understand what the problem is.
Sili wrote to me with his experiences of using
Linux audio
software and his suggestions for improvements, and I cc'd my
reply to the list.
Oh, thanks. I just couldn't understand what the problem was (I
probably don't now, either).
Bye,
--
Andrea Glorioso sama(a)miu-ft.org +39 333 820 5723
.:: Media Innovation Unit - Firenze Tecnologia ::.
Conquering the world for fun and profit
_______________________________________________
Consortium mailing list
Consortium(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.agnula.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/consortium
9:02 p.m.
New subject: Linux audio workstations
>>>> "Sili" == Sili Attila
<jeanlucp(a)wassup.exs.hu> writes:
Hello there! Here is Attila Sili. I decided to
subscribe on
linuxaudio list so its easier for messaging. I wrote an email
to Daniel my view about how the linux audio workstation should
work.
Oh, thanks - I guess I'll just have to re-read your mail, then.
Cheers,
--
Andrea Glorioso sama(a)miu-ft.org +39 333 820 5723
.:: Media Innovation Unit - Firenze Tecnologia ::.
Conquering the world for fun and profit
7287
days inactive
7297
days old
consortium@lists.linuxaudio.org
5 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Andrea Glorioso -
Daniel James -
Sili Attila