[LAU] The totally useless debate about purported 'natural' tunings [WAS]: Re: "droning" project: 249-257

[Ralf Mardorf]

On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 12:47:26 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>On Thu, 2015-10-01 at 12:16 +0200, Set Hallstrom wrote:
>> Everything inside the universe, is in "harmony with the universe".
>
>There is absolutely no harmony in reality.
>
>Eckankar and Buddhism for example claim to know the phonetic sound of a
>very special initially cosmic sound, unfortunately they use different
>phonetic sounds.
>
>Refugees escaped from unharmonious situations.
>
>Electric power needs a difference of potentials.
>
>Balance, harmony would be A=0Hz, OTOH our speakers burn at 0Hz, it's
>not very harmonic from their point of view. A=0 Hz would mean that all
>other notes are 0Hz too.
>
>Despite of human ethics and/or emotions, chaos, inhomogeneity seems to
>be what the universe is based on.
>
>War likely is more "consistent with the universe", than peace is.
>
>Regards,
>Ralf

PS: Self-resonance could be very destructive, IOW it's a kind of harmony
that demolish things. What is the definition of "harmony", of "good"
and "bad". It depends to the point of view. Everything is in a
transitional state.

I seriously asked for the definition of "in consistence with the
universe" and against what the maths is applied. Btw. should art be in
harmony with something or should it be in opposition to something?