[Consortium] problem about inclusion of Ubuntu

jaromil jaromil at dyne.org
Thu Mar 23 09:50:24 EST 2006

Hash: SHA1

hi Ivica,
thanks for your clarifications!

On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 11:22:10AM -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
> > think such projects, especially when still in their
> Consortium's mission is to foster a development of *any* legal
> incentive which has, does, or has a potential to foster proliferation
> of Linux as a viable DAW.

AFAIK, so far its role has been almost related to promotion and the
work done by a few people here who have my gratitude.
now i look forward to efforts in fostering development!
any ideas in mind?  money is not the best way IMHO.
linking with hardware manufacturers has been mentioned (and done?)
what else?

> > starting phase, can be considered to have contributed so much to
> > development and dissemination of our common efforts.
> All projects were at some point in their starting phase. That fact alone
> should therefore not be taken as a measure of their current or future
> success, or their eligibility for the Linuxaudio.org membership...

so if post the 0.1 of my new little sw used by me and my cousin in a
performance, i can already be part of the consortium?

do we distinguish between membership of communities, foundations,
individuals, companies etc. ?

and one last question to help me understand better:

who takes decisions and how?


- -- 
 jaromil,  dyne.org rasta coder,  http://afrolinux.org

Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Cryptographically signed mail, see http://gnupg.org


More information about the Consortium mailing list