[linux-audio-dev] Re: realtime-lsm in the kernel

Lee Revell rlrevell at joe-job.com
Wed Sep 8 04:52:27 UTC 2004


On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 00:42, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> Lee Revell <rlrevell at joe-job.com> writes:
> 
> > Anyway if the author does not object, I would be willing to spearhead a
> > drive to get this into the kernel.  I am sure they will approve as soon
> > as 100s linux audio users voice their approval... 
> 
> It's fine with me.  I agree that it makes sense, but have not been
> willing to hassle with the LKML, myself.  Several others have
> suggested it in the past, but no one was willing to push it through
> the process.
> 

OK, great.  I might as well do this before I get sick of LKML and
unsubscribe ;-).

> If you do that, I'll help.  I have a version in my CVS working tree
> that will build as a kernel patch with the appropriate Kconfig and
> Makefile updates.  Please copy me on any messages you send to the
> LKML, I'm not subscribed.

Can you send this to me?  I will cc: you and Torben on anything I post.

> 
> Torben was the original author, and I've been developing and
> maintaining it since the end of 2003.  I doubt he will object, but he
> can speak for himself.  :-)
> 

OK, since it will have his name on it too, I will see if he has any
objections before I post it.

> Adding it to the kernel sources would probably make maintenance
> easier.

Yes, definitely.  I see many more controversial, more complex, and less
useful features getting added to the kernel all the time, this seems
like a no brainer, because every audio user will need it.  Once we get
this in the kernel it will be a one step process (apply Ingo's patches)
to get up and running on 2.6.

Lee




More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list