[linux-audio-dev] Re: [Jackit-devel] Re: realtime-lsm in the kernel

Lee Revell rlrevell at joe-job.com
Wed Sep 8 23:14:02 UTC 2004


On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 00:42, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> Lee Revell <rlrevell at joe-job.com> writes:
> 
> > Anyway if the author does not object, I would be willing to spearhead a
> > drive to get this into the kernel.  I am sure they will approve as soon
> > as 100s linux audio users voice their approval... 
> 
> It's fine with me.  I agree that it makes sense, but have not been
> willing to hassle with the LKML, myself.  Several others have
> suggested it in the past, but no one was willing to push it through
> the process.
> 
> If you do that, I'll help.  I have a version in my CVS working tree
> that will build as a kernel patch with the appropriate Kconfig and
> Makefile updates.  Please copy me on any messages you send to the
> LKML, I'm not subscribed.
> 
> Torben was the original author, and I've been developing and
> maintaining it since the end of 2003.  I doubt he will object, but he
> can speak for himself.  :-)
> 
> Adding it to the kernel sources would probably make maintenance
> easier.

OK, I am removing LAU from the cc's, as this is now a technical
discussion rather than an opinion poll. ;-)

Are there any known issues with the code that the kernel guys might
bring up?  Seems like it has been stable for a while.  The only thing I
notices was that the indentation doesn't follow the recommended kernel
style.

I found your original RFC post to the LSM mailing list, I was thinking
of including a pointer to that, as everything in there still seems to
apply.

Also, I assume you are not referring to sourceforge CVS, because I
looked and there aren't any Kconfig patches.  Can you commit this to SF
CVS so I can check it out?

Anyway let me know when you have a patch you are comfortable submitting
for inclusion in the kernel and I will go ahead and post it.

Lee






More information about the Linux-audio-dev mailing list