[linux-audio-user] Good Studio Hearphones

Ryan Underwood nemesis-lists at icequake.net
Thu Jul 22 21:47:14 EDT 2004

On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 06:19:21PM -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
> I didn't A/B them, but i did listen to them at different times. And i
> could easily compare both to the SR125 since that's the Grado that i
> own. So my comparison might be unreliable, but it matches what other
> people say.
> The SR80 are more lively.

Is that good or bad?  I think the overall opinion is that Grado phones
are already a little trigger happy ;)

> > except for the "holes"
> > in the can covers... I'm not sure how that would feel compared to the
> > SR60's solid covers.
> I'm not certain i understand what do you mean by that. The SR60 that i
> saw had similar cans to the SR80, as you can see on the gradolabs.com
> site.

Hmm, on the site, they seem to have either a wrong picture for the SR60,
or are using different covers than on my two pairs.  On mine, the part
that contacts the ear is just a flat round foam cover.  On the picture
of both the SR60 and the SR80 on their site, there is a "donut" or "cup"
that surrounds the ear, which is very different from the SR60 that I

Ryan Underwood, <nemesis at icequake.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20040722/46088aee/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Linux-audio-user mailing list