[LAU] Rosegarden/distro

[Svend-Erik K Madsen]

Roger E skrev:
>
>
> Svend-Erik Kjær Madsen wrote:
>> lør, 14 06 2008 kl. 13:48 +1000, skrev Roger E:
>>
>>  
>>> You're bound to get some comments on a post like that!
>>> I agree that studio64 is probably the best. I don't use Suse on the 
>>> getting in bed with the devil principle. But I also prefer Kde or 
>>> Xfce to Gnome.
>>> The latest Musix is very impressive, though maybe not really cutting 
>>> edge. dyne:bolic is very cool.
>>> However I make most music on my everyday Debian/kde testing, which 
>>> is updated regularly. No RT kernel like Studio64 or Musix etc., but 
>>> Jack still runs nice with about 6ms latency on the vanilla kernel. 
>>> And no rebooting after browsing, mailing or killing evil zombies in 
>>> a 3d game. :)
>>>
>>> Roger
>>>     
>>
>> Hi Roger
>>
>> Could you share the secret behind getting a plain debian running
>> "stable" round 6ms without any other apps affecting the invironment ?
>> I guess if you have found the right settings it does not matter which
>> desktop to choose ?
>>
>> /Sv-e
>>
>>
>>  
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-audio-user mailing list
>>> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
>>> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>>>     
>>
>>
>>   
> I've attached a png snapshot of my Jack settings. Just about to leave 
> for work or I'd send text. (or which text file has these?)
> I think my secret is using an M-Audio Audophile 2496.
> And the kernels in an updated testing (Lenny atm) seem to get more 
> audio-friendly over time so stable (Etch atm) may be a little harder. 
> Then again Musix is based on Etch and works great.
>
> Cheers,Roger
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>


Ok, I've got an RME Multiface, but if I use a samplerate of 96000 my 
ADAT is no good.

/Sv-e