[LAU] Hardware VST host?

[Andrew C]

>But the vendors don't open up the specs how it works

Um, isn't that like, going against the GPL if they're not giving the code
back (wine/kernel patches) back to the community?

Andrew Coughlan

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Brett McCoy <idragosani at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Michael Bohle <opendaw at jacklab.org>
> wrote:
>
> >> Not all VSTs have equivalents on Linux, sadly, especially with regard
> >> to virtual instruments.
> >
> > We have good instruments like Hexter and so on, enough for music
> production. If it is not enough for you, start to developing other virtual
> instruments. But don't look back to the proprietary shiny VST preset
> wonderland, we don't need this.
>
> I would love to develop more virtual instruments but don't have the
> resources for recording orchestral instruments and choirs. It's doubly
> sad that a lot of manufacturers are moving to proprietary sample
> engines so you can't even migrate the samples into LinuxSampler or
> similar. There are a large number of sample libraries that simply
> can't be used on Linux. I'm not saying I like the situation, I'd like
> to be running a 100% Linux studio, but have no choice.
>
> -- Brett
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> "In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden;
>    If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world."
>               -- Jelaleddin Rumi
>  _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.linuxaudio.org/pipermail/linux-audio-user/attachments/20090922/101bd270/attachment.htm