[LAU] for sale: "vintage" RME interfaces

[bernard]

Paul, interesting path, and I have two questions.

1 Why did you choose Motu usb over Fireface usb class compliant ? It may 
of course be just a matter of cost.

2 Did you experienced any issues with the Motu AVB as reported here ? :

https://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=18046

(don't read the whole thread, just the last pages)


This said, on my side, I reused a RME DIGI96/8 PAD as reported here :

https://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=18210


Cheers

Bernard


Le 14/12/2018 à 14:04, Paul Davis a écrit :
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:51 AM Michael Jarosch 
> <riotsound at riotmusic.de <mailto:riotsound at riotmusic.de>> wrote:
>
>     Another question is: What device replaced the 9652?
>
>
> for me personally? my soundcard journey:
>
>      Turtle Beach Tropez+ (I wrote the driver)
>      Hoontech something or other (the last interface to do multi-open 
> in hardware - 16 or 32 subdevices!)
>      RME Hammerfall 9652 (I rewrote the driver, thanks Winfried)
>      RME Digiface
>      RME HDSP 9652
>            .... RME Fireface 400 (used on a Mac Mini)
>      MOTU Ultralite AVB
>
> I'd rather be using RME+PCI still, but the form factor of computers I 
> use now (mini-ATX etc) doesn't allow it. The MOTU is a solid device, 
> and nearly as flexible as the *amazing* fireface 400, but MOTU+USB is 
> never going to warm my heart in the same way as the various RME 
> devices did.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user at lists.linuxaudio.org
> https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.linuxaudio.org/archives/linux-audio-user/attachments/20181214/b788aa63/attachment.html>