30 Mar
2006
30 Mar
'06
8:55 p.m.
From: consortium-bounces(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
[mailto:consortium-
bounces(a)lists.linuxaudio.org] On Behalf Of Steve Harris
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 3:53 AM
To: 'consortium'
Subject: Re: [Consortium] problem about inclusion of Ubuntu
Backtracking a few thoughts, I would call for any voting software to come
from outside the consortium, just so theres no risk of any claims of
conflict of interest, eg. (not an endorsement, just google result)
http://www.ballotbin.com/
Personally, I dont like the idea of voting in new members, it seems very
exclusionist. I would prefer to just let anyone who agreed to abide by the
rules join, but I recognise that it's not that simple.
Great suggestions, Steve. I agree on both accounts, especially on the
"exclusionist" aspect. We neither can afford to be exclusionist nor does
such a behavior seem to be compatible with our mission. Rather, IMHO we
should work on reinforcing the notion of variety we enjoy in a libre
community.
Best wishes,
Ico
- Steve
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 01:59:01 -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
_______________________________________________
Consortium mailing list
Consortium(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/consortium
> > If my understanding is correct, and
please correct me if I am wrong,
in
a
Cool! Thanks for clarifying this!
Best wishes,
Ico
_______________________________________________
Consortium mailing list
Consortium(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/consortium case of a tie that calls for a deciding vote,
then that's the only
peculiar
situation where the director can vote.
No, the policy says that the Chair of the Management Board has the
casting vote, which is Dave of course.