Re: [Jack-Devel] Considering JamRouter, a low-jitter MIDI bridge for all Jack versions

Oh that's just perfect it would appear that you're exactly who I was looking for. So in your opinion, JamRouter may or may not live up to its claims, at least when not using an exact replica of the author's setup, and may be prone to unexpected behavior. I already noticed that- I had to remove some signal handlers that aren't usually listened for on posix to get it to launch. Glancing at the codebase, while it's not terrible, I don't really see the author wasting a lot of time debating the finer points of scoping. If it's not too much trouble, I have an old school Hammerfall hooked up to a W530- could you kindly use your clout as nitpicker-in-chief to define approximately what kind of data and how much of it would satisfy you to make a reliable initial jitter comparison benchmark of, say, current jack1 and JamRouter? Would this do? https://github.com/koppi/alsa-midi-latency-test If you already have your preferred command-line switches for your favorite test program handy, all the better. Now, I will get off your lawn. Carlo -- View this message in context: http://jack-audio.10948.n7.nabble.com/Considering-JamRouter-a-low-jitter-MI… Sent from the Jackit mailing list archive at Nabble.com.