25 Jan
2017
25 Jan
'17
7:19 a.m.
Thanks for your answer!
In your first mail, you write
Zita-ajbridge will detect the relative period phases,
and insert
buffering so as to ensure that the difference in latency is always the
same.
That sounds to me like the two cards get additional latency, but it will be
exactly the same so their outputs remain in correct phase.
However, in your second mail, you write:
Without resampling the samples will not be modified,
but the latency of
the two cards will not be the same (but the difference will be
repeatable).
That sounds like the very opposite.
So will there be any additional latency when using zita? Can it be
configured to be the same for all cards? Could the latency be configured to
something minimal like 64 samples?
2017-01-24 20:45 GMT+01:00 Fons Adriaensen <fons(a)linuxaudio.org>rg>:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 05:13:53PM +0100, Jörg Müller
wrote:
However, the information needs to be unaltered,
no resampling or any
modification is allowed for our processing. What command line settings
do I
have to use to make sure of that? How can I use
the official
zita-ajbridge
or is there some documentation about it?
Use the -h option or man zita-a2j or man zita-j2a.
Without resampling the samples will not be modified, but the latency
of the two cards will not be the same (but the difference will be
repeatable).
Ciao,
--
FA
A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia.
It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris
and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)
_______________________________________________
Jack-Devel mailing list
Jack-Devel(a)lists.jackaudio.org
http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org