1 Feb
2016
1 Feb
'16
7:10 a.m.
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Patrick Shirkey <pshirkey(a)boosthardware.com>
wrote:
It seems that the differences between JACK1 and JACK2 relate to the
intended target use case. JACK2 does a decent job of trying to enable many
consumer friendly tasks and take out some of the pain of doing inter
application audio production. JACK1 handles some heavy lifting scenarios
more effectively than JACK2.
On Linux, JACK1 provides extremely easy ways to use multiple devices at
once, full integration with the ALSA sequencer system for MIDI and the
metadata system to allow for "pretty names" among other things.
JACK2 offers dbus integration which means that it can interact with
pulseaudio to "share" a device.
I don't think that your characterization is entirely accurate.
If he is interested, I nominate Harry Van Haaren as
the new official
maintainer for JACK1 codebase. He has proven his skills and commitment and
is a fair and impartial communicator.
Filipe (falktx) has already volunteered for the position.