Re: [Jack-Devel] jackaudio.org pull request

For ardour.org and community.ardour.org, we mirror the git repo to the webserver and make it rebuild the page(s) after a receiver. It works pretty easily - edit, commit, push ... gets mirrored automatically, website is rebuilt. But I'm fine with any approach, really. It is true that the rebuild-on-server thing does make slightly more of a demand on the webserver config. On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Markus Seeber &lt;markus.seeber(a)mailbox.org&gt; wrote: > I will think about that since that could solve some other problems too, > like being able to insert build date or commit hash or a tag into the > generated page. > > Would you prefer the webserver to rebuild the page after a push? This > would require jekyll to be available on the webserver in the required > version (maintenance effort). > The other possibility would be to have discrete releases where _site is > rebuilt and tags are created, which would not require jekyll on the > webserver. > Depends on how you or anyone else maintaining the hosting would like to > have that handled. > > If no decision is made, I'd rather tag discrete releases for now. > > On 05/03/2016 08:48 PM, Paul Davis wrote: >> Well, either that or there needs to be post-pull hook that rebuilds _site >> ... >> >> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Markus Seeber < > markus.seeber(a)spectralbird.de >>> wrote: >>> This is correct. It is in sync with the changes I mentioned with the >>> last "pull request mail". The reason for not rebuilding "_site" on every >>> commit is, that changes to markdown files may generate a lot of changes >>> in "_site" so I do not commit "_site" on every change. >>> >>> I can create tags in future to signal a release, would this be > appropriate? >>> On 05/03/2016 08:05 PM, Paul Davis wrote: >>>> Markus - pulled the site, but the contents of the _site folder/dir do > not >>>> appear up to date ... >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Markus Seeber < >>>> markus.seeber(a)spectralbird.de&gt; wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 04/05/2016 03:38 PM, JoergSorge wrote: >>>>>>> Do you think the software is in a state such that end users can > build, >>>>>>> install, configure and use it themselves? >>>>>> That's a good question ;-) I know, I have a lot to do to make install >>>>>> and docs user friendly... >>>>>> Regards Jörg >>>>>> >>>>> I tracked your request anyway: >>>>> https://github.com/jackaudio/jackaudio.github.com/issues/45 >>>>> >>>>> If you think it is worth sharing, I'll include it. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards >>>>> Markus >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Jack-Devel mailing list >>>>> Jack-Devel(a)lists.jackaudio.org >>>>> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org >>>>> >