24 Jan
2017
24 Jan
'17
1:18 p.m.
On Tue, January 24, 2017 20:41, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 04:27:00PM +0100, Thomas Brand
wrote:
I wrongly mixed this up with zita-n2j/j2n while its about zita-a2j/j2a,
sorry for that.
One of both interfaces will be slaved to the
other and then both should
run the same cycle at the same time (so theoretically no phasing
issues). You just have to manage to shove forth and back the sample data
from/to interface at good enough rate which isn't a particular problem
on localhost using UDP like zita does. If there is no resampling
involved, this can work for many many channels without hitting the CPU
too much.
This is all as wrong as it can possibly be.
First, even when resampling is disabled there is no defined relation
between the period timing of Jack's main soundcard and the one added with
zita-ajbridge. Zita-ajbridge will detect the relative period phases, and
insert buffering so as to ensure that the difference in latency is always
the same.
Second, there is no UDP or anything network involved at all.