15 May
2016
15 May
'16
3:04 p.m.
the infrastructure for backends is a bit more complex than for clients. but
otherwise, it's a perfectly reasonable thing to work on.... but ... not
portable across JACK implementations (which may or may not be important).
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Chris Caudle <chris(a)chriscaudle.org> wrote:
On Sun, May 15, 2016 7:13 am, Paul Davis wrote:
Drivers are in-process, not out-of-process like
most clients.
You could write two in-process clients. You could also write slave
drivers, which are like backends but different in subtle ways.
I'm not sure why everyone is dancing around the obvious answer: what the
original poster seems to want is a new backend. Is that really difficult?
It sounds like he wants something that is just very simple, tailored
exactly to the hardware he has, without some of the complexity that comes
along with ALSA. Is that an unreasonable thing to work on?
--
Chris Caudle
_______________________________________________
Jack-Devel mailing list
Jack-Devel(a)lists.jackaudio.org
http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org