20 Jul
2015
20 Jul
'15
5:48 a.m.
On 20/07/15 22:15, Paul Davis wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Matt Flax
<flatmax(a)flatmax.org> wrote:
Thats the point, it is more about what is useful for software to
interface, rather then what protocol to use. Well mostly anyway ...
Matt
Thanks for the question.
Jack has network audio working well - this is a big bonus, as on these
limited systems you can't do too much audio processing as they have limited
resources and power.
Jack also uses LPC based compression over the network - which is lossless.
That is normally a minimum of 2 times compression.
Can you tell me how you would approach this ? I understand that by getting
rid of Jack, you would free up a large amount of already limited memory on
these devices ... but how would you do network audio in a standard fashion ?
There
are no standards for network audio, just so we're clear. Or more
precisely, there are so many "standards" that there are no standards.