26 Jul
2017
26 Jul
'17
2:50 a.m.
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 23:58:25 -0700, Yuri wrote:
It defines frame sizes in milliseconds, and allows 5
ms, 10 ms, 20 ms,
25 ms, ... which in case of 48,000 sample rate are never a power of
two.
The unit "ms" doesn't fit, since "ms" is the unit for the
latency.
Actually you have the unit "Hz" for the sample rate and you have
"frames".
Given that you could calculate.
x frames / y Hz sample rate = n seconds latency
e.g.
128 frames / 44100 Hz = 0.0029 sec
IOW 2.9 ms.
You perhaps calculated this way
0.005 sec * 44800 Hz = 224 frames
but actually we could assume the 5 ms are a rounded value, since
actually "frames" don't have the unit "ms".