25 Apr
2016
25 Apr
'16
4:40 a.m.
Two new installers to test for Windows :
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28869550/Jack_v1.9.11_32_setup.exe
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28869550/Jack_v1.9.11_64_setup.exe
Thanks.
Stéphane
25 Apr
25 Apr
5:34 a.m.
On 25/04/2016 10:40, Stéphane Letz wrote:
Two new installers to test for Windows :
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28869550/Jack_v1.9.11_32_setup.exe
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28869550/Jack_v1.9.11_64_setup.exe
I just tested the 32-bit installer on Windows 8.1. Firstly, I've
attached a png file which shows an anomaly with one of the displayed
dialog pages. It's all okay up to the License Agreement page but the
page for selecting a destination folder looks like the attached png
(assuming it comes through). I've tried running the installer several
times and I see the same problem each time.
Secondly, I tested with Harrison Mixbus-3 which gave me a run time error
saying "Jack: jack_port_set_name: deprecated". Presumably that's
something that Mixbus or Ardour will need to sort out? Best regards,
John
6:04 a.m.
On 04/25/2016 12:34 PM, John Emmas wrote:
Jack: jack_port_set_name: deprecated"
That's fine.
Ardour binaries are compatible back to Ubuntu 10.04 so we cannot use the
newer API. If you (or a distro) compiles it there's a configuration
check as for which API to use.
jackd should not report this as *error* at runtime.
A user cannot do anything about it. It should only be a compile time
*warning*.
Even though deprecated, removing the function would break jack's ABI, so
marking this as error is even more questionable.
2c,
robin
1 May
1 May
6:35 a.m.
On 25/04/2016 10:40, Stéphane Letz wrote:
Two new installers to test for Windows :
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28869550/Jack_v1.9.11_32_setup.exe
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/28869550/Jack_v1.9.11_64_setup.exe
I just found an opportunity to try the 64-bit installer.
Firstly, the installation folder it offered was "C:\Program Files
(x86)\Jack" (which suggests that its actually a 32-bit installer).
Secondly, whenever I try to launch the newly installed jackd.exe I see
an error message from Windows (see attachment).
FWIW I've tried looking for a DLL called libjackserver64.dll but there
doesn't seem to be one (the installer seems to have installed
libjackserver.dll). So it looks like there's some kind of mix-up
somewhere. Maybe the 64-bit installer contains some mixture of 64-bit
and 32-bit modules?
John
6 May
6 May
12:37 a.m.
On 01/05/2016 12:35, John Emmas wrote:
I just found an opportunity to try the 64-bit installer.
Firstly, the installation folder it offered was "C:\Program Files
(x86)\Jack" (which suggests that its actually a 32-bit installer).
Secondly, whenever I try to launch the newly installed jackd.exe I see
an error message from Windows (see attachment).
FWIW I've tried looking for a DLL called libjackserver64.dll but there
doesn't seem to be one (the installer seems to have installed
libjackserver.dll). So it looks like there's some kind of mix-up
somewhere. Maybe the 64-bit installer contains some mixture of 64-bit
and 32-bit modules?
Just wondered if anyone else can reproduce these problems?
John
1:40 a.m.
Download Jack just now. Tried W7 64 bit,Beside dll erorr, also got a
behavior warning.See attachments
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 1:37 PM, John Emmas <johne53(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
On 01/05/2016 12:35, John Emmas wrote:
I just found an opportunity to try the 64-bit installer.
Firstly, the installation folder it offered was "C:\Program Files
(x86)\Jack" (which suggests that its actually a 32-bit installer).
Secondly, whenever I try to launch the newly installed jackd.exe I see an
error message from Windows (see attachment).
FWIW I've tried looking for a DLL called libjackserver64.dll but there
doesn't seem to be one (the installer seems to have installed
libjackserver.dll). So it looks like there's some kind of mix-up
somewhere. Maybe the 64-bit installer contains some mixture of 64-bit and
32-bit modules?
Just wondered if anyone else can reproduce these problems?
John
_______________________________________________
Jack-Devel mailing list
Jack-Devel(a)lists.jackaudio.org
http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
12 May
12 May
2:13 a.m.
On 06/05/2016 07:40, happy musicmaker wrote:
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 1:37 PM, John Emmas <johne53(a)tiscali.co.uk
<mailto:johne53@tiscali.co.uk>> wrote:
I just found an opportunity to try the 64-bit installer.
Firstly, the installation folder it offered was "C:\Program
Files (x86)\Jack" (which suggests that its actually a 32-bit
installer). Secondly, whenever I try to launch the newly
installed jackd.exe I see an error message from Windows
[...]
Just wondered if anyone else can reproduce these problems?
Download Jack just now. Tried W7 64 bit, Beside dll erorr, also got a
behavior warning.
Stephane - are me and Happy Musicmaker the only 2 people who've
experienced problems with the latest installers? Or should we assume
the problems aren't fixable?
John
14 May
14 May
1:12 p.m.
On 01/05/2016 12:35, John Emmas wrote:
I just found an opportunity to try the 64-bit installer.
Firstly, the installation folder it offered was "C:\Program Files
(x86)\Jack" (which suggests that its actually a 32-bit installer).
Secondly, whenever I try to launch the newly installed jackd.exe I see
an error message from Windows (see attachment).
Oops - I think I just realised that the 2nd problem might be my own
fault :-(
Inside the folder "C:\Windows\Jack" there were previously some DLLs
which got installed by Mixbus. In order to prevent them from getting
over-written I renamed them temporarily. But it seems like Jack was
still trying to load them - even though they no longer had the extension
".dll". I just moved them out of that folder and I no longer see the
attached error message.
I'm still not sure though whether the installer installed 64-bit jack or
32-bit. Is there any way I can find out?
John
15 May
15 May
5:53 a.m.
On 14/05/2016 19:12, John Emmas wrote:
I'm still not sure though whether the installer installed 64-bit jack
or 32-bit. Is there any way I can find out?
Okay, I'm not sure if anyone's actually reading these reports but after
some further experiments, I think I finally figured this out. Here's
what I said in my original report:-
On 01/05/2016 12:35, John Emmas wrote:
I just found an opportunity to try the 64-bit installer.
Firstly, the installation folder it offered was "C:\Program Files
(x86)\Jack" (which suggests that its actually a 32-bit installer)
What seems to be happening is that the 64-bit installer is installing 2
x 32-bit components, namely:-
C:\Windows\System32\libjack.dll
C:\Windows\System32\libjackserver.dll
These are in addition to their 64-bit counterparts which get installed
here:-
C:\Windows\libjack64.dll
C:\Windows\libjackserver64.dll
I think it's those 32-bit components which cause Windows to offer the
32-bit install location (C:\Program Files (x86)\Jack) instead of the
more traditional C:\Program Files\Jack
Having said that... the installer for v1.9.10 seems to be the same - so
maybe it's intentional?
John
18 May
18 May
2:42 a.m.
Le 15 mai 2016 à 12:53, John Emmas
<johne53(a)tiscali.co.uk> a écrit :
On 14/05/2016 19:12, John Emmas wrote:
Yes : 64 bits installer installs 64 bits and 32 bits DLLs.
Stéphane
I'm still not sure though whether the installer installed 64-bit jack or 32-bit. Is
there any way I can find out?
Okay, I'm not sure if anyone's actually reading these reports but after some
further experiments, I think I finally figured this out. Here's what I said in my
original report:-
On 01/05/2016 12:35, John Emmas wrote:
I just found an opportunity to try the 64-bit installer.
Firstly, the installation folder it offered was "C:\Program Files (x86)\Jack"
(which suggests that its actually a 32-bit installer)
What seems to be happening is that the 64-bit installer is installing 2 x 32-bit
components, namely:-
C:\Windows\System32\libjack.dll
C:\Windows\System32\libjackserver.dll
These are in addition to their 64-bit counterparts which get installed here:-
C:\Windows\libjack64.dll
C:\Windows\libjackserver64.dll
I think it's those 32-bit components which cause Windows to offer the 32-bit install
location (C:\Program Files (x86)\Jack) instead of the more traditional C:\Program
Files\Jack
Having said that... the installer for v1.9.10 seems to be the same - so maybe it's
intentional?
John
______________________________________________
1 Jun
1 Jun
12:54 a.m.
Installed Jack 64 bit on Win 10 (latest fast channel preview) yesterday
(May 31) and now it installed correctly. (Link from the Jack 2 webpage).
Only it seem my Focusrite 18i20 is not detected in Jack and on internal
hardware it won't start either. (always errors)
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Stéphane Letz <letz(a)grame.fr> wrote:
Okay, I'm not sure if anyone's actually reading these reports but after
some further experiments, I think I finally figured this out. Here's what I
said in my original report:-
What seems to be happening is that the 64-bit installer is installing 2 x 32-bit
components, namely:-
Le 15 mai 2016 à 12:53, John Emmas
<johne53(a)tiscali.co.uk> a écrit :
On 14/05/2016 19:12, John Emmas wrote:
>
> I'm still not sure though whether the installer installed 64-bit jack
or
32-bit. Is there any way I can find out?
On 01/05/2016 12:35, John Emmas wrote:
>
> I just found an opportunity to try the 64-bit installer.
>
> Firstly, the installation folder it offered was "C:\Program Files
(x86)\Jack" (which suggests that its actually a 32-bit installer)
C:\Windows\System32\libjack.dll
C:\Windows\System32\libjackserver.dll
These are in addition to their 64-bit counterparts which get installed
here:-
C:\Windows\libjack64.dll
C:\Windows\libjackserver64.dll
I think it's those 32-bit components which cause Windows to offer the
32-bit
install location (C:\Program Files (x86)\Jack) instead of the more
traditional C:\Program Files\Jack
Having said that... the installer for v1.9.10 seems to be the same - so
maybe
it's intentional?
John
______________________________________________
Yes : 64 bits installer installs 64 bits and 32 bits DLLs.
Stéphane
_______________________________________________
Jack-Devel mailing list
Jack-Devel(a)lists.jackaudio.org
http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
3055
days inactive
3091
days old
jackaudio@lists.linuxaudio.org
10 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
happy musicmaker -
John Emmas -
Robin Gareus -
Stéphane Letz