26 Mar
2019
26 Mar
'19
12:28 p.m.
On Tue, March 26, 2019 19:11, liebrecht(a)grossmann-venter.com wrote:
Not my place to comment on this, but it will be very
nice.
With all due respect, you have spilled so much BS to this list that it's
time to stop now, thank you. If you intend to get help from this list,
provide useful information in a dense way, learn how to reply to a list
thread and free yourself from wrong expectations and things you've picked
up elsewhere.
Best regards
Thomas
26 Mar
26 Mar
12:32 p.m.
New subject: [Jack-Devel] JACK is a great deterministic audio server
Well, I give you constructive information and you explode because
obviously you are happy with your head in the sand rather than to face
what users have to endure.
On 2019-03-26 14:26, Thomas Brand wrote:
On Tue, March 26, 2019 19:11,
liebrecht(a)grossmann-venter.com wrote:
Not my place to comment on this, but it will be
very nice.
With all due respect, you have spilled so much BS to this list that
it's
time to stop now, thank you. If you intend to get help from this list,
provide useful information in a dense way, learn how to reply to a list
thread and free yourself from wrong expectations and things you've
picked
up elsewhere.
Best regards
Thomas 
1:09 p.m.
New subject: [Jack-Devel] JACK is a great deterministic audio server
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 02:32:20PM -0400, liebrecht(a)grossmann-venter.com wrote:
Well, I give you constructive information and you
explode because
obviously you are happy with your head in the sand rather than to face
what users have to endure.
I think 'endure' is quite unfair. It's a voluntary project
developed by unpaid people. It's not like they're deliberately
inflicting it on less technically minded users.
You'll get more useful replies here if you can cut down on
the emotional content of your posts and stick to relevant
technical information.
John
1:30 p.m.
New subject: [Jack-Devel] JACK is a great deterministic audio server
On 2019-03-26 16:01, John Rigg wrote:
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 02:32:20PM -0400,
liebrecht(a)grossmann-venter.com wrote:
Ok fine, but I dont understand the basis for the emotional outburst I
replied to as I was cortious and gave the person my support for is
effort. Please read it.
Well, I give you constructive information and you
explode because
obviously you are happy with your head in the sand rather than to face
what users have to endure.
I think 'endure' is quite unfair. It's a voluntary project
developed by unpaid people. It's not like they're deliberately
inflicting it on less technically minded users
You'll get more useful replies here if you can cut down on
the emotional content of your posts and stick to relevant
technical information.
It is not really fair to accuse me of emotions regarding to the post you
quote from.
Anyway, I have no interest in that sort of behavior and will stick to
trying to get jack running in a deterministic way if possible.
2028
days inactive
2028
days old
jackaudio@lists.linuxaudio.org
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
John Rigg -
liebrecht＠grossmann-venter.com -
Thomas Brand