9 Aug
2019
9 Aug
'19
10:31 a.m.
A lot of the traffic on jack-devel lately has been
routine linux audio user questions, often concerning
problems that aren't anything to do with JACK. This
makes it difficult to follow actual JACK development
posts as they tend to get buried.
Would a separate jack-users list be a good idea?
John
9 Aug
9 Aug
10:41 a.m.
Would a separate jack-users list be a good idea?
Possibly, but there are long periods of time with very low traffic on the
list, and traditionally a lot of the questions have been such that the
developers were some of the few people with expertise to answer.
My personal opinion is that based on historical patterns, just
recommending some threads be moved to linux-audio-users would probably be
better than starting a separate mailing list which might end up with very
few people monitoring.
--
Chris Caudle
11:03 a.m.
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 10:41:01AM -0500, Chris Caudle wrote:
Fair points. The jackaudio.org web site does mention the
linux-audio-user list, but maybe it could be made clearer
there that LAU is more appropriate than jack-devel for
general user questions.
John
Would a
separate jack-users list be a good idea?
Possibly, but there are long periods of time with very low traffic on the
list, and traditionally a lot of the questions have been such that the
developers were some of the few people with expertise to answer.
My personal opinion is that based on historical patterns, just
recommending some threads be moved to linux-audio-users would probably be
better than starting a separate mailing list which might end up with very
few people monitoring. 
1:21 p.m.
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 10:41:01AM -0500, Chris Caudle
wrote:
> My personal opinion is that based on historical patterns, just
> recommending some threads be moved to linux-audio-users would probably be
> better
Agree.
And the example of linux-audio-users and linux-audio-dev shows that most
people aren't able to post their questions to the correct group there
either. ;-/
Am 09.08.19 um 18:02 schrieb John Rigg:
The jackaudio.org web site does mention the
linux-audio-user list, but maybe it could be made clearer
there that LAU is more appropriate than jack-devel for
general user questions.
The source of the jackaudio.org content is on Github, so it's easy to
make PR with a better wording:
https://github.com/jackaudio/jackaudio.github.com/pulls
I'm not sure who's responsible for merging it and updating the site
then, though.
Chris
5:36 p.m.
On 8/9/19 12:02 PM, John Rigg wrote:
Although this is a Jack developer list, hopefully members do not mind
occasional discussions about how others program for Jack (as I am
engaged in ATM) with experts watching to correct something.
Tim.
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 10:41:01AM -0500, Chris Caudle
wrote:
>> Would a separate jack-users list be a good idea?
>
> Possibly, but there are long periods of time with very low traffic on the
> list, and traditionally a lot of the questions have been such that the
> developers were some of the few people with expertise to answer.
I've noticed things generally have been quiet these days here and
on LAD, LAU. Wonder why.
But I am happy to see that actually there is much action on
Jack github, much development and discussion happening still.
My personal
opinion is that based on historical patterns, just
recommending some threads be moved to linux-audio-users would probably be
better than starting a separate mailing list which might end up with very
few people monitoring.
Fair points. The jackaudio.org web site does mention the
linux-audio-user list, but maybe it could be made clearer
there that LAU is more appropriate than jack-devel for
general user questions.
John
1962
days inactive
1962
days old
jackaudio@lists.linuxaudio.org
4 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Chris Caudle -
Christopher Arndt -
John Rigg -
Tim