is there anyone out there who can make jackd pass more than 32 channels of
audio? i use pro tools and would like to route more than 32 channels to
mixbus 3
--
View this message in context: http://jack-audio.10948.n7.nabble.com/32-channel-limit-tp18959.html
Sent from the Jackit mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I know this would not solve all needs, but I assume that session manager ( I believe project here mean session ) could set some user friendly aliases for ports on start session and remove after close. OFC this will not solve case where two sessions are opened simultaneously. Question was "is there any way" .. I believe that aliases are currently the only ( portable ) way.
Dnia Czwartek, 12 Maja 2016 08:49 Hanspeter Portner <ventosus(a)airpost.net> napisał(a)
> On 12.05.2016 08:26, Pawel wrote:
> > What about aliases ?
>
> Which one? a port can have up to 2 aliases...
>
> > Dnia Czwartek, 12 Maja 2016 08:22 Hanspeter Portner <ventosus(a)airpost.net> napisał(a)
> >> On 12.05.2016 06:27, aledez0 wrote:
> >>> is there any way to list the connections by how there are in the project file
> >>> instead of by alphabetical order?
> >>
> >> YES (theoretically)
> >>
> >> There is a way, by means of the metadata api [1] via the metadata key
> >> 'http://jackaudio.org/metadata/order' [2], but the trio of JACK client,
> >> server and patchbay must support this for it to work.
> >>
> >> * the client sets the order of its ports via 'jack_set_property'
> >> * the server stores the metadata in a database
> >> * the patchbay reads the metadata to order ports accordingingly
> >>
> >> NO (practically)
> >>
> >> * only few clients and patchbays support this yet
> >> * JACK1 implements the metadata API, JACK2 still does NOT
> >>
> >> > in mixbus 3 once you have named the tracks
> >>> they don't show up in the connection window in the order they are in the
> >>> project window.
> >>
> >> [1] http://jackaudio.org/api/group__Metadata.html
> >> [2] https://github.com/drobilla/jackey/blob/master/jackey.h
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Jack-Devel mailing list
> >> Jack-Devel(a)lists.jackaudio.org
> >> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
> >
> >
> >
Hi all,
The build of qjackctl included with jackdmp for windows is getting really
old.
The biggest problem is that the default "startup time" is set too low,
making it
seem like "jack crashes". (I"ve got many complains that "jack crashes").
Another problem is that you manually have to append "-S" to the "Server
Prefix".
So here:
https://github.com/kmatheussen/qjackctl
...I've cloned the official qjackctl repository, fixed these two problems,
and added some files to make it straight forward to build qjackctl under
mingw32.
(Building is just running the "build_mingw32.sh" script)
Windows binary: http://folk.uio.no/~ksvalast/qjackctl.zip
Perhaps this build, or something similar, can be included in the next
release of jack for windows?
For ardour.org and community.ardour.org, we mirror the git repo to the
webserver and make it rebuild the page(s) after a receiver. It works pretty
easily - edit, commit, push ... gets mirrored automatically, website is
rebuilt.
But I'm fine with any approach, really. It is true that the
rebuild-on-server thing does make slightly more of a demand on the
webserver config.
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Markus Seeber <markus.seeber(a)mailbox.org>
wrote:
> I will think about that since that could solve some other problems too,
> like being able to insert build date or commit hash or a tag into the
> generated page.
>
> Would you prefer the webserver to rebuild the page after a push? This
> would require jekyll to be available on the webserver in the required
> version (maintenance effort).
> The other possibility would be to have discrete releases where _site is
> rebuilt and tags are created, which would not require jekyll on the
> webserver.
> Depends on how you or anyone else maintaining the hosting would like to
> have that handled.
>
> If no decision is made, I'd rather tag discrete releases for now.
>
> On 05/03/2016 08:48 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> > Well, either that or there needs to be post-pull hook that rebuilds _site
> > ...
> >
> > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Markus Seeber <
> markus.seeber(a)spectralbird.de
> >> wrote:
> >> This is correct. It is in sync with the changes I mentioned with the
> >> last "pull request mail". The reason for not rebuilding "_site" on every
> >> commit is, that changes to markdown files may generate a lot of changes
> >> in "_site" so I do not commit "_site" on every change.
> >>
> >> I can create tags in future to signal a release, would this be
> appropriate?
> >>
> >> On 05/03/2016 08:05 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> >>> Markus - pulled the site, but the contents of the _site folder/dir do
> not
> >>> appear up to date ...
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Markus Seeber <
> >>> markus.seeber(a)spectralbird.de> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 04/05/2016 03:38 PM, JoergSorge wrote:
> >>>>>> Do you think the software is in a state such that end users can
> build,
> >>>>>> install, configure and use it themselves?
> >>>>> That's a good question ;-) I know, I have a lot to do to make install
> >>>>> and docs user friendly...
> >>>>> Regards Jörg
> >>>>>
> >>>> I tracked your request anyway:
> >>>> https://github.com/jackaudio/jackaudio.github.com/issues/45
> >>>>
> >>>> If you think it is worth sharing, I'll include it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards
> >>>> Markus
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Jack-Devel mailing list
> >>>> Jack-Devel(a)lists.jackaudio.org
> >>>> http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org
> >>>>
>
>
Greetings all,
What would it cost to address the El Capitan issues with JackPilot /
JackRouter? I would like to put my money where my mouth is and either pay
for it myself or gather funding for it to be fixed. I really love the
software and would like to see it continue.
I was a happy user of JackPilot and JackRouter until updating to El
Capitan. Now, I have to use another program called Loopback that, while it
works consistently, has almost 10x the latency I was able to get before.
Sean