On 03/11/16 14:43, Xavier Mendez wrote:
(2)
Instead of +1, add +8. Since JACK_CLIENT_NAME_SIZE==64 and
JACK_SERVER_NAME_SIZE==256, we'd be on 8-byte boundaries. This is a
trivial fix that doesn't rely on (1). Please try and report back.
That's
what I had in mind when I made the PR. As you said it'd be error
prone so yeah, I'd vote for (2), at least for now.
Are you going to test (2) and maybe send/update a pull request once
successful?