Linux-audio-dev April 2003

linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

77 participants
76 discussions

by Fred Gleason

Has anyone seen this yet? http://www.rwonline.com/dailynews/one.php?id=2852 What's particularly interesting is that, according to some of the buzz I've been hearing, their primary implemention platform is Linux (in an embedded mode, I imagine). None of which is to say that it'll be Open, but this could be a pretty kicking thing to have available. Cheers! |-------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Frederick F. Gleason, Jr. | Salem Radio Labs | | Voice: 1-(540)-341-2880 | 87 Lee Highway, Suite 11 | | FAX: 1-(540)-341-7176 | Warrenton, VA 20186 | |-------------------------------------------------------------------------| | When your client's hopping mad, | | Put his picture in the ad. | | If he still should prove refractory, | | Add a picture of his factory. | | -- The Advertising Agency Song | |-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

21 years, 8 months

[linux-audio-dev] firewire/IEC 61883-6

by rm

i have a box i'd like to use as an outboard synth, and since the box in question has firewire, it seems like an ideal interface instead of requiring a separate midi/audio interface + mixer channels for it. i looked around a bit and it seems like AMDTP/IEC61883-6 is starting to be used and is in the linux 1394 drivers. it appears to include multi-channel audio and midi which would be quite cool. (it also appears not to be mlan). anyone tried this stuff out? looks like it would make a really nice interconnect. thanks, rob ---- Robert Melby Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332 uucp: ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt4255a Internet: async(a)cc.gatech.edu

21 years, 8 months

[linux-audio-dev] nice quote from mix [ob: linux]

by Paul Davis

Eddie Ciletti, reviewing the Soundscape-32: "Automation and control-surface options deserve mention because Mackie has probably done more to push development in this area than any other company has since its aquisition of Soundscape. Randomly mating controllers and workstations yields mixed results and often minimal functionality. You expect the faders, mutes and transport controls to work. But plug-ins vary greatly and present a challenge to developers. That's why Mackie's claim that its control interfaces seamlessly with Soundscape-32 is so encouraging. I think it would be great if a little DIY software package was included with every controller and workstation so that users with lots of time on their hands can bring all of the pieces together. As with LINUX, people should be able to contribute their work toward the common good. Meanwhile, back in reality land, I tested Soundscpe-32 with CM Labs' Motor-Mix, focusing on faders, balance, mute and transport controls because those were the required tasks at that project's stage. My only request is to be able to access Console Manager from more than just the mystery icon at the bottom-right corner of Window's System Tray."

21 years, 8 months

[linux-audio-dev] LJ article on Karlsruhe meeting now on-line

by Dave Phillips

Greetings: The Linux Journal has published my account of the LAD meeting, you can read it here: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=6762&mode=thread&order=0 I'm sorry I didn't get a chance to have you all review it first, but LJ wanted it yesterday morning and caught me by surprise (I thought they'd want it later for hard-copy). Please post errata and corrections to the LJ Comments section, thanks ! Best regards, == Dave Phillips The Book Of Linux Music & Sound at http://www.nostarch.com/lms.htm The Linux Soundapps Site at http://linux-sound.org

21 years, 8 months

[linux-audio-dev] RH9 experiences?

by rm

hi, anyone tried rh9 with audio applications yet? or otherwise have anything to say with regard to audio and the new glibc and threading model? rob ---- Robert Melby Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Georgia, 30332 uucp: ...!{decvax,hplabs,ncar,purdue,rutgers}!gatech!prism!gt4255a Internet: async(a)cc.gatech.edu

21 years, 8 months

[linux-audio-dev] Needing help in resolving the Pd-Gem package linker problem (and hopefully learn something in the process :-)

by Ivica Bukvic

Hi all, This is the issue I've been dealing with for the past couple of hours. I am using mostly vanilla Mdk 9.0. I am trying to compile Gem from source (for Pd), and while it does compile without any problems at runtime (pd -lib Gem) I get the following issue: /usr/lib/pd/extra/Gem.pd_linux: /usr/lib/pd/extra/Gem.pd_linux: undefined symbol: __ctype_toupper_loc /usr/lib/pd/extra/Gem: can't load library I've tracked this one to the gcc library (please correct me if I am wrong). However, there are no errors at compile time: g++ -o Gem.pd_linux -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L../../../GemLibs/liborb ../Manips/*.o ../Particles/*.o ../Base/*.o ../MarkEx/*.o ../Pixes/*.o ../Controls/*.o ../Nongeos/*.o ../Geos/*.o ../openGL/*.o -shared -lquicktime -lmpeg3 -lorb -lglib -lgltt -lttf -ljpeg -ltiff -lpng -lglut -lGLU -lGL -lz -lm -Wl,-shared -Wl,-export-dynamic -lXxf86vm -lXext -lX11 I also tried adding all over the place -lgcc like this: g++ -o Gem.pd_linux -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L../../../GemLibs/liborb ../Manips/*.o ../Particles/*.o ../Base/*.o ../MarkEx/*.o ../Pixes/*.o ../Controls/*.o ../Nongeos/*.o ../Geos/*.o ../openGL/*.o -shared -lgcc -lquicktime -lmpeg3 -lorb -lglib -lgltt -lttf -ljpeg -ltiff -lpng -lglut -lGLU -lGL -lz -lm -Wl,-shared -lgcc -Wl,-export-dynamic -lgcc -lXxf86vm -lXext -lX11 and the compile is successful, but I still keep getting the same error. I tried building the static version, but then I get the following error: g++ -o Gem.pd_linux -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L../../../GemLibs/liborb ../Manips/*.o ../Particles/*.o ../Base/*.o ../MarkEx/*.o ../Pixes/*.o ../Controls/*.o ../Nongeos/*.o ../Geos/*.o ../openGL/*.o -shared -lquicktime -lmpeg3 -lorb -lglib -lgltt -lttf -ljpeg -ltiff -lpng -lglut -lGLU -lGL -Wl,-Bstatic -lz -lm -Wl,-shared -Wl,-export-dynamic -lXxf86vm -lXext -lX11 /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [Gem.pd_linux] Error 1 I then checked ld -lgcc_s And the only thing I got was: ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; not setting start address Now, could someone please tell me what the heck does this mean??? ldd /usr/lib/libgcc_s.so gives: libc.so.6 => /lib/i686/libc.so.6 (0x4001a000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000) At this point, I am confused and do not know what to do. I tried upgrading ldconfig, ld, and am currently recompiling gcc from a cooker source (which is taking a lot of time). So, I would greatly appreciate any help I can get on this issue, since the whole idea of linking is not so clear to me. Finally, I would appreciate the explanation of -Bstatic flag which seems to invoke -lgcc_s that is subsequently not found for whatever reason, despite the fact the ld otherwise finds it (with the aforementioned warning though). Any help on this issue is greatly appreciated! Sincerely, Ico

21 years, 8 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Linux-audio-dev April 2003