Linux-audio-dev October 2005

linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

79 participants
51 discussions

by james＠dis-dot-dat.net

I've written a simple patch to add info on the real-time capabilities of LADSPA plugins in CheeseTracker. I know I seem to be the only CheeseTracker user on the lists, but just in case... http://blog.dis-dot-dat.net/2005/10/cheesetracker-patch.html -- "I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual This++' and 'Integrated Development That' to get to gcc, Emacs, and gdb. Thank you." (By Vance Petree, Virginia Power)

19 years, 2 months

[linux-audio-dev] List maintainer: action required !

by fons adriaensen

Hello, Could someone please remove 'joesgarage79(a)cs.com' from the subscription list ? The last weeks I get a bounce from AOL for every message posted... -- FA

19 years, 2 months

[linux-audio-dev] applying RIAA curves in software

by Richard Smith

I'm going to convert my fathers record collection over to CD. Doing some google research. According to http://www.tracertek.com/newway.htm they claim the "new" and best way to do LP to CD is to use a flat preamp, record at 24bit, 96kHz and then apply the RIAA curve in software after the fact. Either before or after the DeNoise, De-Click, etc depending. I've also seen a few other sites that say the same type things. tracertek sells doze software to do the whole ball of wax but I'd like to use Linux. I haven't found any RIAA filters yet so I guess I'm looking at writeing one. So does anyone have any information on where to find the official RIAA curve to make a plugin from? They also recommend using a pink-noise record to calibrate your setup and then adjust the curve so it matches your system. -- Richard A. Smith

19 years, 2 months

[linux-audio-dev] Latency and feedback problems: soundcard with live microphone pass-thru, optimal solution ?

by Benno Senoner

Hi all, I would like to route a microphone through a sound card and back to powerful amplified speakers. As we know in analog PA gear you have the microphone feedback problem (usually it comes in form of high pitched whistle sounds). But if I route a mic from into the soundcard and out to the speakers, there will be a small delay due to the audio card buffers. Even if it's only a few msecs it makes the problem much worse than in the case of analogue gear because the feedback sound will come in chunks that's one audio card buffer at time. For example if I use 64 samples per buffer which gives me acceptable latency for a live singer, the feedback noise could possibly generate a much lower pitched signal/interference (I assume something like 44100/64 Hz) which is I think not easy to filter out compared to the high pitched feedback (is in the latter case sufficient to cut some high frequencies using an EQ ?). How can one solve the feedback problem in case of mic to speaker delays of let's say 5-10msecs ? Is an echo canceller algorithm needed ? If yes does this compromise the quality of the input signal (the singer). I think this is a very interesting topic and it would be cool if knowledgable people could come up with topics and ideas. (for example people that are good at DSP, room correction etc, like Fons A. etc). PS: I know that cards like DELTA 1010 and others (RME) can do zero latency monitoring (hardware pass-thru) but I'd prefer a software based routing since you can apply effects and stuff before forwarding the output. thanks for infos and toughts Benno http://www.linuxsampler.org

19 years, 2 months

[linux-audio-dev] [ANN] WhySynth DSSI softsynth

by Sean Bolton

Introducing WhySynth, a DSSI softsynth plugin. WhySynth, as in 'Y'-synth, the super-sized, frankensteinized, evolved and mutated, still rather dorky younger sibling of Xsynth-DSSI. WhySynth, as in (I sometimes ask), "_why_ am I working on another softsynth instead of on paying gigs?" (Following my bliss? Addiction? One last shot at misspent youth?) WhySynth, as in a mostly-new design featuring: - 4 oscillators per voice, in your choice of 6 modes (minBLEP, wavecycle, asynchronous granular, FM, waveshaper, and noise), - 2 filters, also in multiple flavors, - flexible routing and mixdown to stereo output, - 3 (or is it 6?) LFOs (instrument-wide, per-voice, and multiphase), - 5 multi-mode envelope generators, - abundant modulation options, - and effects (well, Tim Goetze's Versatile plate reverb is all at the moment, unless you count the DC-blocker anti-effect). WhySynth is a work in progress. Actually, since the kid was born, progress has slowed to a near-utter standstill, but if I can't release often, I might as well release early. Get your tarball, boring screenshot, and html-ized README today at: http://home.jps.net/~musound/whysynth.html then get your butts back to making cool music -- however you define that. Cheers, -Sean

19 years, 2 months

[linux-audio-dev] Radio receiver.

by James Courtier-Dutton

Hi, I want to plug a ham radio receiver into the sound card of my PC, and use the CPU of the PC to tidy up the signal, to hopefully make it more readable. One form of communications is called Morse Code, where a single tone is switched on and then off to pass a signal over the radio. I know it is easy to do band pass filters in Linux so that only the tone gets through, but the other really useful thing would be a noise filter. I was hoping that someone had already written a open source noise filter that I could use. If so, can someone point me to it, because I can't seem to find it on google. The noise filter needs to happen in real time, so ideally a plugin for ardour of something like that. James

19 years, 2 months

[linux-audio-dev] ladspa problem on OSX 10.4 figured out

by Taybin Rutkin

On 10.4, Apple removed the deprecated dlopen() mechanism of using _init() and _fini(). Instead, function attributes should be used. These have been supported in gcc since at least 2.9x. So instead of: void _init() {} void _fini() {} you should use: __attribute__((constructor)) void init() {} __attribute__((destructor)) void fini() {} Thanks, Taybin

19 years, 2 months

RE: [linux-audio-dev] Re: applying RIAA curves in software

by Cornell III, Howard M

I stand by my assertion that the RIAA record curve attenuates the low frequencies and amplifies the high frequencies. The physical effects on the record are such that the attenuated low frequencies do not cause the cutting head trace to take up so much room on the master, and by the same reasoning, the normally low amplitudes at high frequencies are given more (physical) headroom. Of course the reverse filter would flatten the frequency response and the use of the record filter optimizes the use of the master "real estate". -----Original Message----- From: linux-audio-dev-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-dev-bounces@music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of fons adriaensen Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 5:00 PM To: The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: applying RIAA curves in software On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 04:10:12PM -0500, Richard Smith wrote: > > > > > The RIAA record curve reduces bass and increases treble, and the > > > reverse RIAA curve for playback does the opposite. > > > > Sorry, but this is plain wrong. The RIAA filter used when cutting a > > disk master will boost bass (below 50 Hz), and reduce high > > frequencies. This actually leads to a worse S/N ratio on playback. It looks like this: > > I'm confused then. > > This page: > > http://www.bonavolta.ch/hobby/en/audio/riaa.htm > > Has a spread sheet that runs the math on the equation presented. > Unless I'm just backwards for RIAA reproduction it yeilds roughly 20dB > of gain for 20Hz and -21dB for 21kHz. Which seems backward from what > you are saying. That curve, the same as (3) in my previous post, is often called 'the RIAA curve' but it isn't. It is the combination two things: * a 1/F (or -6dB/oct) filter that is required to compensate for the +6dB/oct response of a magnetic cartridge, * and the real RIAA playback curve, (2) in my previous post, which boosts high frequencies. In other words, the general downward slope of the filter you refer to has nothing to do with RIAA equalisation, it's there only because that filter is designed for use in a preamp for a magnetic cartridge. If you would have a flat frequency response from the cartridge, then the filtering required needs to boost high frequencies, as in (2). If you take (2), and turn it 45 degrees clockwise (that adds the -6dB/oct slope for the transducer), you get the curve you refer to. So the idea that the RIAA curve was introduced to improve the S/N ratio at high frequencies is just wrong, it does the opposite. -- FA

19 years, 2 months

RE: [linux-audio-dev] Re: applying RIAA curves in software

by Cornell III, Howard M

Maybe use a crystal cartridge that puts out approximately one volt instead of a magnetic cartridge that puts out tens of millivolts. That attacks the signal to noise problem from the signal side. The RIAA record curve reduces bass and increases treble, and the reverse RIAA curve for playback does the opposite. If most of the objectionable noise is high frequency and you only filter it once wouldn't you just have to do it when the noise was accentuated, before the reverse RIAA filter? -----Original Message----- From: linux-audio-dev-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-dev-bounces@music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Smith Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 1:36 PM To: The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: applying RIAA curves in software > Quite a lot of words. I´m impressed. And convinced ... > > ... of the fact, that these guys just want to sell their stuff. > You really think its just all hype? Sort of made sense to me. If you do click and pop removal prior to the un-RIAA. Then that will go that much further to reduce the noise since its all high-frequency. > If you have a decent phono preamp, use it and forget all about that > tracertek advertising hype. > I don't have a preamp at all. Thats part of what led me to that page. Recommendations? -- Richard A. Smith

19 years, 2 months

Re: [linux-audio-dev] applying RIAA curves in software

by Richard Audette

Not sure if it's scriptable, but I believe Audacity has this built in: Effects -> Equalization -> RIAA Richard At 09:38 AM 10/25/2005, you wrote: >I'm going to convert my fathers record collection over to CD. Doing >some google research. > >According to http://www.tracertek.com/newway.htm they claim the "new" >and best way to do LP to CD is to use a flat preamp, record at 24bit, >96kHz and then apply the RIAA curve in software after the fact. >Either before or after the DeNoise, De-Click, etc depending. I've >also seen a few other sites that say the same type things. > >tracertek sells doze software to do the whole ball of wax but I'd like >to use Linux. > >I haven't found any RIAA filters yet so I guess I'm looking at >writeing one. So does anyone have any information on where to find >the official RIAA curve to make a plugin from? > >They also recommend using a pink-noise record to calibrate your setup >and then adjust the curve so it matches your system. > >-- >Richard A. Smith

19 years, 2 months

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Linux-audio-dev October 2005