Linux-audio-dev December 2009

linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

87 participants
71 discussions

ladspavst.linuxaudio.org site is going offline

by Ivica Ico Bukvic

All ladspavst users/contributors, A ladspavst visitor has brought to my attention that the ladspavst.linuxaudio.org has been spammed for quite some time, rendering a page into useless goop of spam. This is mainly due to lack of moderation. As a result, I've no other choice than to take the site offline until further notice. If you or someone you know is supposed to take care of this site, please contact me and we'll figure out the best way to bring this site back online. Until that happens, the site will remain offline. Best wishes, Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A. Composition, Music Technology Director, DISIS Interactive Sound & Intermedia Studio Director, L2Ork Linux Laptop Orchestra Assistant Co-Director, CCTAD CHCI, CS, and Art (by courtesy) Virginia Tech Dept. of Music - 0240 Blacksburg, VA 24061 (540) 231-6139 (540) 231-5034 (fax) ico(a)vt.edu http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/bukvic/

15 years, 10 months

Maximum size of SysEx messages in JACK MIDI and ALSA sequencer

by Dominic Sacré

Hi, I'm wondering what the size limit is for SysEx messages in the JACK MIDI and ALSA sequencer APIs. My observations so far: In JACK MIDI, a SysEx message can be as large as the MIDI port buffer, which in turn has the same size as an audio buffer for one period. This is assuming that there are no other events transmitted on the same port during the same period. Is this correct? Or are applications somehow expected to handle larger SysEx messages split over multiple periods? In the documentation of the ALSA sequencer API, I couldn't find any mention of an upper limit. Some sources suggest that ALSA splits SysEx messages into chunks of 256 bytes, but from my own attempts at sending larger messages, it seems the limit is actually somewhere around 5500 bytes. Unfortunately ALSA doesn't seem to report an error when I try to send larger chunks, instead the messages just disappear. Can anyone shed some light on how to handle larger SysEx messages correctly? Thanks, Dominic

15 years, 10 months

libsndfile-1.0.21

by Erik de Castro Lopo

Hi all, Yesterday I released version 1.0.21 of libsndfile. Its available here: http://www.mega-nerd.com/libsndfile/#Download Main changes for this version are: * Add a couple of new binary programs to programs/ dir. * Remove sndfile-jackplay (now in sndfile-tools package). * Add windows only function sf_wchar_open(). * Bunch of minor bug fixes. Cheers, Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/

15 years, 10 months

Hi,,go to Dopcity !!

by Γιάννης Γράβεζας

dear www.dopcity.com ，It can be a good place for select christmas gift! let's go!

15 years, 10 months

Possible snd_pcm_hw_params_set_buffer_time_near() gotcha

by Mario Lang

Hi. I just happened to stumble about a (what I call) pretty subtle bug in typical ALSA PCM code: root@fzidpc73:/tmp# cat test.c #include <stdio.h> int main() { int period = 1024; int nperiods = 3; int rate = 96000; unsigned buffer_time = 1000000*period*nperiods/rate; printf("%d\n", buffer_time); } root@fzidpc73:/tmp# ./test -12739 root@fzidpc73:/tmp# sed -i -e 's/int rate/unsigned int rate/' test.c root@fzidpc73:/tmp# gcc -o test test.c root@fzidpc73:/tmp# ./test 32000 I.e., don't trust this boilerplate formula blindly. -- CYa, ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕

15 years, 10 months

Re: [LAD] First L2Ork track now available

by Ivica Ico Bukvic

> amount of positive feedback and it has been truly hart-touching to learn Umm, that should read "heart-touching"... DOH! :-) Ico

15 years, 10 months

First L2Ork track now available

by Ivica Ico Bukvic

Dear fellow FOSS enthusiasts, Last week's L2Ork debut was a great success with the performance hall packed and people standing in the back. We've had a tremendous amount of positive feedback and it has been truly hart-touching to learn that people genuinely cared about and were moved by what we had to share. As some of you may be already aware, our story also made the Slashdot and our server has received close to a half a million hits since its posting. Likewise, we've been featured on regional TV channels as well as various international news outlets. As our thanks to all who have so generously supported us both in person and through the endless corners of the internet, we've posted a track from our weekend recording session. "Citadel" is a piece for soprano and L2Ork that uses a poem by Ivan Gundulic, a famous Croatian poet from the Baroque era. The piece was recorded in a beautifully reverberant Burruss rotunda on the Virginia Tech campus. No post-processing has been applied to the recording beyond a minor eq to soften lows. To listen please visit http://l2ork.music.vt.edu/main/ and click on the Media->Jukebox, or simply click on the link in what is currently the top post on the L2Ork blog. Once again, thank you all for your kind support. We will be starting a public l2ork-dev list soon, so if you wish to contribute, participate, or start your own L2Ork, please do not hesitate to join in on the discussion. Likewise, should you feel compelled to leave a comment, please feel free to do so on our jukebox page (no registration required). Best wishes, Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A. Composition, Music Technology Director, DISIS Interactive Sound & Intermedia Studio Director, L2Ork Linux Laptop Orchestra Assistant Co-Director, CCTAD CHCI, CS, and Art (by courtesy) Virginia Tech Dept. of Music - 0240 Blacksburg, VA 24061 (540) 231-6139 (540) 231-5034 (fax) ico(a)vt.edu http://www.music.vt.edu/faculty/bukvic/

15 years, 10 months

Re: [LAD] jack ringbuffer question

by lieven moors

Thanks for pointing that out to me. I've started a version which uses atomic pointer exchange, and this is something I wasn't aware of. I think it shouldn't be a problem right now, as I keep the objects I use in memory, and I don't need the reaction of the program to the pointer swap to be a realtime operation. thanks again for your reply, lieven

15 years, 10 months

Re: [LAD] FOSS Ethernet Soundcard

by Patrick Shirkey

On 11/29/2009 03:36 PM, Ken Restivo wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:33:45AM +0100, Karl Hammar wrote: > >> Nick Copeland: >> >>> Adrian Knoth: >>> >>>> I'm also somewhat interested in the network part, I feel IPv6 could help >>>> a lot. It supports autoconfiguration and it has decent multicast >>>> support, so it would be possible to broadcast/multicast the streams on >>>> the net (LAN). This could be useful if you want to access the stream at >>>> a mixing console for a life setup and simultaneously record it on a >>>> computer. >>>> >>> Put another way, it would be far more compatible if this were done over >>> an IP stream rather than any native ethernet stream, not least it could use >>> any ethernet driver that linux supports rather than a small subset of them. >>> >> Ack, a standard ip-stream is a sensible first choise. >> >> >>> Perhaps the project needs to be specified with regards to its goals? >>> >> ... >> >> My goals is "just" to extend another project (industrial i/o). >> What would your goals be ? >> >> Shall we decide on a single mailing list ? >> >> > IIRC the motivation for this was: > > 1) Firewire is going away on laptops > 2) USB 2.0 is proprietary and non-standard > 3) Because of (1) and (2), Linux Audio users will soon be left without any way to do multichannel recording on laptops. > > The original thread converged on a goal pretty quickly: an inexpensive, multi-channel audio interface which is open hardware and software, and uses Gig Ethernet as its physical connection method. > > So, if I were going to put the goal simply: I'd like a Focusrite Saffire (or equivalent) that runs over Ethernet, please :-) Price-wise, it'd be nice if it cost the same or less than equivalent USB 2.0 product. Latency-wise, comparable with USB 2.0. > > In terms of how many I/O, I think that was still being calculated and experimentation was going to be required. Obviously options for 4, 8, or 16 I/O would be nice. > > Did anyone have a good reason for not including support for a usb-1.0/2.0/3.0 interface seeing as we can write the driver ourselves and adhere to the standard? Most chipsets these days have support for both port types. It would be very useful if the schematic provided tracks for both ootb. BTW, I will be able to contribute development funds towards this project if required once we have a BoM. Cheers. Patrick Shirkey Boost Hardware Ltd

15 years, 10 months

installing stk

by james morris

I've built the Synthesis ToolKit and want to install it, but make install Is there an easy way? I can't install the package for my distro because I've got zero audio packages installed - all built from sauce. James.

15 years, 10 months

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Linux-audio-dev December 2009