Danni Coy wrote:
> I have taken a look at non daw - and I have to say that I am sold on
> the concept (particularly using jack/lash/midi infrastructure wherever
> possible)
> there are a few extra features I would like to see added. But am
> incredibly busy at the moment.
Danni,
That would be cool! I posted this cause it will be a lost for Linux
Audio if this dies imho.
Btw I think I found one disadvantage in the workflow of non-sequencer.
You can choose a scale to work in, but the disadvantage afaik is that
you can't choose notes outsides that scale. Maybe I'm wrong, but if I'm
right it seems to narrow the possibilities quite a bit.
\r
Oops, wrong list.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [LAD] phasex-0.12.0-pre1
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:31:19 +0200
From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>
To: William Weston <weston(a)sysex.net>
CC: linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0909300423380.29352(a)astarte.lysdexia.org>
William Weston wrote:
> Download phasex and hear for yourself...
>
> http://sysex.net/phasex/
>
> Alternatively, you can utilize the git repositoty:
>
> git clone http://sysex.net/git/phasex.git
>
The screenshots are bright :), I'll compile it within the next days. Is
there a DSSI version available?
Ralf
--
Taking a look at the screenshots reminds me to ask something OT: Does
anybody know an insiders' tip were to get CME microchips for old
faithful analog synth by a fair price?
Folks,
Is there anyway to set up an ambiophonic (not to be confused with
ambiosonic decryption) filtering on a Linux system? I'd prefer 4
channel if possible. I'm aware of brutefir, but i doubt i have the
knowledge to set up so complicated a system equation by equation. Are
there brutefir scripts out there for it? Anyone know of a ambiophonic
ladspa plug in or something?
Thanks,
Bearcat M Sandor
Hi,
[this is mostly addressed to Linux Audio friends from Germany's Southwest]
from November 15th-16th, 2009, the German Software&Support Media Group is
hosting the "OpenSourceExpo" in Karlsruhe, Germany. I am not exactly sure
yet about its target audience, but it appears like a "small brother" of the
LinuxTag with a more local attitude.
They offer free booth space, tables and wLan access for free software projects,
and I was thinking about applying for a booth there to show off some of the
current Linux Audio developments there, as we did when LinuxTag was still in
Karlsruhe (2002..2005 or so). That would mean setting up the booth with
computer, monitor, mixer, speakers, keyboard etc, and preparing some demo
material.
However, this task would need 1 or 2 more volunteers to man the booth during
that time (please note: This is on a Sunday+Monday!). If anyone is interested,
please get in contact with me off-list (or even here).
Find more information about the OpenSource Expo here:
http://www.pro-linux.de/news/2009/14664.html (german)
http://it-republik.de/konferenzen/opensourceexpo09/
Thanks for reading,
Frank
jens, i assume you meant this to go to the list?
Jens M Andreasen wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 14:53 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
>> those who are following the development of the xiph CELT low latency
>> codec might find this presentation interesting:
>
>>From the overheads:
>
> - expf() is even slower than exp()
> Changes exception handling mode of FPU, even if it's
> already set correctly, then changes it "back"
>
> This is a showstopper for DAZ and friends. Can somebody explain to those
> in power, that this is a very unkind thing to do?
you could hop on irc.freenode.net, /join #celt, #theora, #speex and/or
#xiph and see if derf (the presenter in the link i posted) or jmspeex
(jean-marc valin, the remote end in the celt presentation) are around,
and discuss it with them directly. alternatively, maybe torben reads
this and picks up the thread?
those who are following the development of the xiph CELT low latency
codec might find this presentation interesting:
http://www.celt-codec.org/presentations/
torben has implemented CELT support in netjack1, and this video helped
me a lot in understanding how it actually works.
i thought perhaps that our resident ambisonics gurus/interested
parties should take a look at this.
--p
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: e deleflie <edeleflie(a)gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 8:21 PM
Subject: [Flac-dev] (Universal) Ambisonic implementation
To: flac-dev(a)xiph.org
Hi Flac Developers,
My name is Etienne Deleflie, I'm the founder of
http://www.ambisonia.com and, more recently, http://soundofspace.com.
Myself and the community I serve are looking for a lossless file
format that can encapsulate ambisonic encoding. To this end a
specification has been drafted, and is nearing stability, that
describes practical features designed to get the most out of
ambisonics.
That spec is accessible here:
http://ambisonics.googlegroups.com/web/Universal_Ambisonic_0.96.pdf
I'm wondering if the FLAC community might be interested in
implementing a lossless implementation of that spec. I know there are
some current incompatibilities. I'm also aware that there are certain
open source processes involved around implementing new features. I'd
be happy to get involved with those processes if someone expressed
interest at implementing these features.
regards,
Etienne
_______________________________________________
Flac-dev mailing list
Flac-dev(a)xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
I was not a member of LAD when the "LV2 port groups" discussion was running
in August.
(First few lines from messages of Jörn Nettingsmeier and David Robillard,
below.)
Now I am 'on list' can I jsut check I have answered everyone's queries?
Regards,
Michael
(Basically using ambisonics.ch URLs as PSIs is no problem ..., MC.)
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: [LAD] LV2 port groups
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:53:54 -0000 (GMT)
From: "Michael Chapman" <chapman(a)mchapman.com>
To: Jörn Nettingsmeier <nettings(a)folkwang-hochschule.de>, dave(a)drobilla.net
Cc: "Linux Audio Developers" <linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org>
On Sunday 16 August 2009 7:17 pm, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> michael, there are plans to implement the ACN/SN3D scheme in the LV2
> plugin standard.
> David Robillard wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 19:22 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> >> David Robillard wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 18:27 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
> >>>> David Robillard wrote:
> >>>>> On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 11:02 -0400, David Robillard wrote:
> >>>>>> http://lv2plug.in/ns/dev/port-groups.lv2/port-groups.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>> P.S. Comments on this from anyone with experience in multi-channel
> >>>>> stuff would be appreciated if there's any problems.
> >>>>>
-------------------------------------------------------