Linux-audio-dev

linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

3 participants
7448 discussions

Re: [LAD] [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?

by Uwaysi Bin Kareem

------- Forwarded message ------- From: "Uwaysi Bin Kareem" <uwaysi.bin.kareem(a)paradoxuncreated.com> To: "Adrian Knoth" <adi(a)drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> Cc: Subject: Re: [LAD] [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward? Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:06:45 +0200 On Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:58:33 +0200, Adrian Knoth <adi(a)drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 05:07:20PM +0200, Uwaysi Bin Kareem wrote: > >> http://paradoxuncreated.com/Blog/wordpress/?p=2268 > > The site mentions: > > --- quote --- >> sudo schedtool -p 98 -n -20 -F `pgrep X` > --- end quote --- > > Setting the X-server to FIFO/98 is just plain wrong, at least on an > audio mailing list. > > And then: > > --- quotes --- >> To go with this I also recommend, using the Ubuntu 2d desktop, as it has >> low-jitter. Also the chromium-browser has low-jitter (better youtube). > --- end quotes --- > > I have no idea what you're trying to prove here, but I'm pretty sure you > have a general misunderstanding of jitter, thread wake-up latencies and > proper scheduling priorities. There seems to be a lot of misunderstandings about scheduling policies and jitter out there. Howver if you want your desktop to slow down, simply by moving another window, then leave it at normal. Jitter for audio seem unaffected by this. The standard kernel seems to almost do 0.33 ms stable on my HDA soundchip. A few clicks, and that is how it is with realtime X aswell. So why not do it, even if audio is your main focus. X is singlethreaded, so it needs to have data ready, for it`s windows or games. Or else it becomes a bottleneck. Do whatever you want with this, but don`t say it is wrong, or some kind of misunderstanding. I would not run a desktop any other way. Peace Be With You.

11 years, 11 months

Re: [LAD] [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?

by Jonathan Woithe

Hi Drew [ Note: due to the way the LAD mailing list mail server and my mail account interacts, this reply is unlikely to make it to the list. Feel free to forward it to the list if that's the case. ] > Let's say I want at least 24 ins. What do I get? I assume you're referring to 24 analog ins. Within a single unit that may be challenging. > I have heard focusrite mentioned. Firewire. Fine, but a bit iffy considering > reports of firewire being "put out to pasture" - is this something to worry > about? It depends on who you speak to. Certainly in the consumer realm it seems to be going out of favour. For semi-pro and professional audio however it appears to be carrying on for the moment (most likely because the bus architecture is so much better than USB for things like AV transport). This is evidenced by the manufacturers continuing to release new firewire-based devices. Over the next few years I expect thunderbolt interfaces to come to the fore (assuming the interface is adopted widely and quickly). However, there remains a huge number of very good firewire-based interfaces out there, and people will continue to want to use them for a number of years yet. As a result, I suspect that there won't be major issues attempting to obtain firewire host cards for the foreseeable future. > So, what focusrite firewire setup will get me 24 ins at once and be linux > compatible? Go to ffado: > : > Focusrite Saffire PRO 40 Experimental > Focusrite Liquid Saffire 56 Reported to work This status is true, unfortunately. I should clarify that the "experimental" tag for the Pro 40 come about because FFADO has not received any information from the manufacturer about this device AFAIK. However, it is proving to be similar to earlier devices (excepting the DSP, which isn't relevant if all you're looking for is raw I/O) and it appears that progress is being made. Ultimately the slow progress is mostly due to a lack of manpower to work on the drivers. Admittedly this doesn't help your current quest. Note that I am not overly familiar with the Focusrite interfaces or the FFADO driver for them; to obtain more detailed information about them it would be best to head to the ffado-user and/or ffado-devel mailing list and post your queries there. > I have seen talk of RME firewire stuff not being well supported. Is that still > the case if it ever was? Back a few years ago it was true; those working on FFADO were unable to get in contact with the right people at RME to facilitate the work on a driver. This changed a couple of years ago and as of FFADO 2.1.0 the Fireface-400 and Fireface-800 are almost fully supported (MIDI I/O and the FF800 TCO are the most significant omissions). In terms of getting 24 analog channels into the computer, you could use a FF800 with two 8-channel ADAT pre's of your choice. Again, it's not a single box with 24 inputs and it's a costly solution, but it should be workable. The RME UCX and UFX devices are currently not supported by FFADO. Adding the support for these is mostly dependent on getting physical access to sample devices. This is still being worked on (financial issues are proving to be a problem). Disclaimer: I work on the FFADO RME driver. Regards jonathan

11 years, 11 months

[LAA] Guitarix release 0.24.1

by hermann meyer

This is a maintenance release of guitarix2 with some minor fixes. Guitarix is a mono tube amplifier simulation for jack, with additional mono/stereo effect racks which can be filled with some in-build effects as well as with external LADSPA plugins. Things that changed in this release: * fix In "organize" mod copying preset form one bank to the same one corrupts the bank * add sse4a (CPU optimization) to wscript * add treble booster unit * set osc buffer-size menu to sensitive false when jack buffer is larger then 1023 to avoid X-runs Please refer to our project page for more information: http://guitarix.sourceforge.net/ download site: http://sourceforge.net/projects/guitarix/ have fun guitarix development team _______________________________________________

11 years, 11 months

Re: [LAD] [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?

by Nils Gey

So, now that this thread shifted into a hardware/driver discussion and the flood of answers has stopped: Have we learned anything from it? For my part the conclusion is make more music make it public make other people want to use the same tools as you Nils

11 years, 12 months

Is Linux audio moving forward - some very personal notes

by Fons Adriaensen

It (see subject) is a good question. In general my answer would be 'yes', but maybe not at the speed one could hope for. The following is just from my perspective, which is 'minority', 'very specialised', or just 'irrelevant', take your choice. That perspective is: * Classical (including contemporary 'classical') music recording. * Spatial audio reproduction, in particular Ambisonics. * Acoustics research. * Audio forensics. I agree that is all quite different from the average musician's POV, so you will be forgiven for considering it irrelevant. In all of those fields Linux audio has served me well, and in particular Ardour has been a very dependable and flexible tool during the past five years or so. If I go back a bit more, it is very clear that things have improved immensely. I remember the second (IIRC) LAC where Paul demoed Jack and Ardour and had to use pkill every two minutes. Things have really gone forward since then, and by quite a distance. But that doesn't mean all is honey. The HW situation has been mentioned. Honestly, I wouldn't know where to go if RME went away. Almost everything I've been doing the last years has not only used their HW, but depended on it - no alternatives. That *is* scary. Things being like that may not be just a Linux problem. I agree with J. Liles that we should have the courage to review Jack. It has done a very good job, but (at least in my world) it is showing its limits, and I'm not at al convinced that these can be removed by 'incremental' improvements. Maybe we need something new and incompatible, with two systems existing during a transition period which could take several years. In particular: * It sould become a system level service, i.e. 'promiscuous'. I've been running modified versions like that for some time. It's a pain currently. Things will maybe improve once systemd becomes universal. * It should have 'persistent' ports or the equivalent. That is, you can start an app, and tell Jack to remember it and its ports even after the app is terminated. The point here is that others can then connect to it even if it doesn't (yet) run. This would simplify things like session management quite a lot. But it also requires cooperation from the apps - one like Ardour that creates and removes ports with arbitrary names at any time doesn't fit well into such a scheme. The solution is to use Jack ports more like audio hardware uses its interfaces: ports are a fixed set (as would be e.g. an ADAT or MADI interface on a HW mixer), but are assignable to any function *within the app*. Any notion of logical function can still be carried as metadata of the port. * All current hardware is SMP. If an audio app has a complex internal processing graph it will implement its own multithreaded scheduling system for audio processing units (as Ardour 3 does). But it's silly to repeat this in every app, and even more silly to schedule apps 'per process', i.e. run them only if *all* of the internal graph can run. This level of logic should move into Jack, or whatever replaces it. The plugin situation is deplorable. Let's face it, 90% of the available ones just don't work, or work for some value of 'work' but are still crap. LV2 has not delivered what was hoped for, IMHO as a result of focussing on the wrong things. Given that things are what they are, any plugin standard on Linux should have a documented and *stable* way to support *any* X11 based GUI, including having a GUI embedded into an app, *and* do that in a way that still works efficiently even if you have 100 plugins in an single app and 500 in your system. Focussing on the right things also means supporting developers who go for quality and are prepared for the effort instead of trying to make things as easy a possible for beginners. One of the reasons I'm not releasing anything as an LV2 plugin is that LV2 doesn't impose any quality standards, and doesn't care about its reputation. It's just bad company. Finally, and on a very personal level, you may have noticed that my output has decreased. But it hasn't. I've written more Linux audio SW during the last years than at any time before. I'm just less inclined to publish it. And I have been asking myself why that is so. One factor may be that much of it is rather specialised. But that is in itself no reason to keep it private, so that doesn't explain things. What has certainly played a role is that fact that I'm tired of the mostly useless discussions that arise whenever you propose something that challenges the status quo, and the need to reach a 'consensus' before anything happens. Which is more often that not just used to kill some idea rather than towards any productive end. -- FA A world of exhaustive, reliable metadata would be an utopia. It's also a pipe-dream, founded on self-delusion, nerd hubris and hysterically inflated market opportunities. (Cory Doctorow)

11 years, 12 months

Re: [LAD] [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?

by Patrick Shirkey

On Thu, October 11, 2012 6:52 am, Louigi Verona wrote: > @Folderol: > > "While it is nice to have lots of different apps, plugins, whatever, I > think you > find most musicians quickly settle on a very small range which they get to > know > extremely well." > > This is true. However, before you settle, you do need to have a choice. > And > there is > very little right now. > > @Dan: > > "He made a number of valid points but I have to agree it was a bit overly > negative. Linux audio has come a long way in the last few years- if still > trailing some way behind commercial offerings in some areas but its > unrealistic to expect otherwise when the big boys have large teams working > full time on development plus some of the apps (Cubase etc.) effectively > pre-date Linux back to the 80's." > > You point out the reason why things are as they are. I did not speak about > the reasons, I tried to capture how I see the state of things, independent > of the reasons. Noting that Linux has come a long way and that we cannot > expect hobbyists to do as well as professionals has nothing to do with a > completely independent statement that Linux has few plugins compared not > even to Windows but to some musicians' needs. ;) > > > I think sometimes it is useful to take such perhaps a slightly negative > look. As long as it is not desperate, this kind of reflection can be > useful > to always be realistic about one's achievements or about state of things. > > Also, I have a hidden hope that someone disproves my view and shows that > in > reality everything is not so bad ;) The problem with that approach is that it tends to feed the negative attitude towards Linux and that is exactly what the "competition" want. So by "trashing" the platform to gather informed responses it can do more harm than good from a marketing and promotional angle. However that method works very well for Fox and The Register so it's definitely a valid approach. After years of trash talk or being ignored what we really need is a dedicated effort to "bigging up" all the things that can be done. Which reminds me, if anyone has any tutorials they want to share on the quicktoots website please send them my way. We get about 500 views a month on that site at the moment and as it has been online for almost 10 years that means almost 50,000 people have viewed tutorials on that site. The toots don't have to be recent or cutting edge. Just useful and informative :-) BTW, for the professional companies out there that is 50,000 very attractive sales prospects that you could have been marketing to for the past 10 years. So if you are a company and want to increase your sales potential it makes sense to be providing professional tutorials for inclusion on the quicktoots site on a regular basis. -- Patrick Shirkey Boost Hardware Ltd

11 years, 12 months

Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?

by Louigi Verona

Hey fellas! Would like to present an article I've written. Mostly wrote it to start a conversation and hear what others have to say on the subject. http://www.louigiverona.ru/?page=projects&s=writings&t=linux&a=linux_progre… You can comment here or on my textboard (which does not require registration). -- Louigi Verona http://www.louigiverona.ru/

11 years, 12 months

Re: [LAD] [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?

by Patrick Shirkey

On Wed, October 10, 2012 11:33 pm, Ben Loftis wrote: > > I'd pose a different question: > > Is OSX/Win Audio moving _backward_? > > If OSX continues to move towards iOS, and Win continues to move towards > Metro, and Thunderbolt stalls, and screens get smaller, and expansion > ports get scarcer, then Linux might become the de-facto "pro" multimedia > platform simply because the other choices have become too dumbed down. > > Of course _most_ users will be happy with the ease and power of the > tools that will be available on iOS/Metro. And _most_ users is where > the money is, so Apple/Microsoft are chasing the right users. But there > will be some serious users that need a powerful production system with > big screens and big peripherals, and for these users, Linux might > become the standard. > Looking at the recent trade shows it seems that Linux/Unix is the already the hardware standard. I didn't spot hardware running on Apple or M$ OS's but plenty of Linux and Unix platforms. Unfortunately it costs $4000 for a booth here so I probably won't be able to do any promotions at the next event. -- Patrick Shirkey Boost Hardware Ltd

11 years, 12 months

Re: [LAD] [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?

by Patrick Shirkey

On Thu, October 11, 2012 5:41 am, Dan MacDonald wrote: > Patrick wrote: > >> >> Looking at the recent trade shows it seems that Linux/Unix is the >> already >> the hardware standard. I didn't spot hardware running on Apple or M$ >> OS's >> but plenty of Linux and Unix platforms. >> >> > Which trade show was this? "Integrate" is the biggest A/V trade show in Australia. It's just a baby compared to US or EU offerings though. > I'm unaware of any hardware vendors advertising > or even officially supporting Linux other than RME kinda but their support > seems little more than half-hearted as they apparently don't provide any > support for their drivers which they say on their website are 3rd party so > did they even have any involvement in them at all? Focusrite provide specs > but no Linux drivers or support so I wouldn't count them either. > Just walking around you can see who is using Unix/Linux and who is not. Granted most of it is embedded or SoC but they are definitely not Apple or Mac OS's on the clear majority of the hardware solutions. Unfortunately for us in the proprietary world it's not "cool" to talk about where you get your firmware/software from so no one is promoting that information. When it comes to desktop solutions no one is representing Linux at the trade shows here. Afaik noone is doing anything explicit for Linux Multimedia solutions at any of the US or EU trade shows either. Given that there are several companies on these lists who do go to the trade shows it seems that we are all missing a big opportunity for promotion of the general platform by not capitalising on the "We heart Linux" bandwagon. > I know its not audio related but even HP who's support for Linux is > arguably better or at least on a par with their support for the other two > OS still don't advertise or claim to officially support Linux - even > though > they do. Sad state of affairs - even now in 2012 when we can all safely > say > Linux isn't going away the big corps still like to pretend it doesn't > exist. > Valve just announced that the Linux port for Steam will go live with 15 titles. Intel, AMD and ARM all promote Linux heavily. The entire top level of the movie industry runs on Linux. Harrison is building Linux Hardware Solutions. RME provides Linux support or standards compliant devices. What is missing is a concerted effort to advertise and promote the advances that have been made. We can't rely on the magazine and mainstream news media publishers to do it for us as they are clearly not interested. So we have to do it ourselves which either means paying the publishers for space or blanketing the web with information. Given that we are unlikely to crowd fund advertising the latter is more viable. Considering that we have several thousand LAU people who also just happen to be handy with a computer and the internet that actually works in our favour. Marketing companies spend millions of client dollars on SEO and manage to get a lot done with just a few dedicated people. We have thousands of users and each one of us can build a website or post links in forums and social media to the landing pages that we want to promote. Our sites all link up to each other anyway so it just needs some effort from people around here to spread the links and evangelise the platform. Having some killer content won't go amiss either. Perhaps the professional companies round here have some AV content that they would like to share more widely for promotional purposes? We are actually looking for some content we can turn into a show reel. So if you know of anything that would be suitable please let us know. -- Patrick Shirkey Boost Hardware Ltd

11 years, 12 months

Re: [LAD] [LAU] Linux Audio 2012: Is Linux Audio moving forward?

by Louigi Verona

Now that I am a little less zealous about free software (which is a different discussion anyway), I might just try Renoise out. I am rather tired of tracker interface. Does Renoise have a piano roll? On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:11 PM, James Mckernon <jmckernon(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hey fellas! > > > > Would like to present an article I've written. Mostly wrote it to start a > > conversation and hear what others have to say on the subject. > > > > > http://www.louigiverona.ru/?page=projects&s=writings&t=linux&a=linux_progre… > > > > You can comment here or on my textboard (which does not require > > registration). > > > > > > -- > > Louigi Verona > > http://www.louigiverona.ru/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Linux-audio-user mailing list > > Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org > > http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user > > > > A smart article - as another 'electronic musician' (by your > definition) using Linux, I'm always interested in your thoughts and > essays on the topic. I agree that things can sometimes look a little > bleak for those hoping to create highly sequenced, > synth-and-effects-based music on Linux, but there are ways and means. > > Incidentally, I wonder if you've ever used Renoise? Not F/OSS, but > runs perfectly well on Linux, and is in some respects sympathetic to > the F/OSS ideology (saves to a simple, open file format, for example). > Anyway, it's the strongest candidate I've found for making sequenced > electronic music per se in LInux. Right now I'm working towards a > workflow of using Renoise as a sequencer to drive simple synthdefs in > Supercollider. > > Cheers, > J > -- Louigi Verona http://www.louigiverona.ru/

11 years, 12 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Linux-audio-dev