Linux-audio-dev

linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

7513 discussions

by Dave Phillips

Greetings, Every now and then I decide to update a page on the original Linux soundapps site. Recently I cleaned up this page for audio/MIDI plugins : http://linux-sound.org/plugins.html Please advise if I've left out anything or if any information there is wrong. I've covered plugins in LADSPA, DSSI, MESS, LV2, and VST formats, hopefully I got all the major projects, and I'd like to know if I've missed anything. TIA! Best, dp

15 years, 3 months

A little quiz about audio measurements...

by fons＠kokkinizita.net

Hello all, This week I had to perform measurements on a audio interface, and this resulted in some quite interesting results. Before revealing what happened, I'll let you have a look at some of the data and come up with your own conclusions, see <http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/quiz.html> (Free beer at the next LAC for the best analysis) Ciao, -- FA O tu, che porte, correndo si ? E guerra e morte !

15 years, 3 months

Re: [LAD] plugins page updated at linux-sound.org

by Dave Phillips

Johannes Kroll wrote: > In the native Linux VST section, you might want > to add Wolpertinger, a little subtractive synth in development, open > source: http://tumbetoene.tuxfamily.org/index.php?category=1 > Done. :) > Another excellent Linux native VST host is Renoise: www.renoise.com. > Non-free though, demo available, the full version costs 58 euros. > > I've added it to the list of compliant hosts. Thanks ! dp

15 years, 3 months

Quiz -- The winners

by fons＠kokkinizita.net

Hello all, This has stirred up more interest (also off-list) than I ever imagined it would ! OK, beers will go to (in no particular order) Niels: his comments on ADC/DAC reference voltages provide the key to understanding what happened. Veronica: for the most to-the-point one-liner. Florian: (off list) who got it right in the end. I guess that at least initially all of you put the blame of card X - either it's crap or it's defective. But the real culprit is card A, even if it did show quite well in the loopback test. And what happens is 100 Hz (rectified power grid 50 Hz) ripple on the DAC and ADC reference voltages, both derived from the same source. Most audio ADCs and DACs have two reference voltages (or one, and then the second is derived internally). In many cases these are the voltages that correspond to the min and max PCM values, and even if that is not the case the conversion factor of the ADC or DAC depends linearly on these voltages. If they are not well filtered, any fluctuations do generate AM, and the effects of the same eror on a ADC and DAC will cancel out. Cancellation also occurs if the sample clock (if shared by ADC and DAC) is modulated, but here the effect is delay modulation, which for a single tone translates into phase modulation proportional to the frequency of the signal. Since in this case the sideband levels do not depend on the measurement frequency, the sidebands are not the result of clock jitter. So Veronica is quite right: you can't trust a loopback test. And if, as in this case, the variations are the result of mains hum, you can't even trust a setup of two cards using the same mains power (although exact cancellation as in this case would be rare). It is also true that you have to be very careful when using a low-fi card to test a much better one. In this case the only purpose of the USB card was to provide a calibrated analog level, which is required for e.g. EIN measurement. The card is portable so I can easily take it to the lab and calibrate it against a high precision certified RMS meter which I can't take out without first filling out a hundred forms and then waiting two weeks. Meanwhile I did measure the signal quality of card X using a *decent* generator - it is extremely good. Ciao, -- FA O tu, che porte, correndo si ? E guerra e morte !

15 years, 3 months

Simple LV2 jack host

by Jeremy

Hi, I'm trying to find a simple host for my LV2 plugin that allows both midi in and out, and also allows you to control plugin parameters. I've found lv2_jack_host, which allows my port configuration, but doesn't seem to allow you to change the parameters, and I've found lv2rack and zynjacku, which allow you to change plugin controls, but don't seem to allow nonstandard input/output port configurations. Any suggestions would be nice. Thank you Jeremy

15 years, 3 months

like "qjackctl", but trimmed of all fat

by Aaron Krister Johnson

Hi linux-audio peoples, I want to announce my new and fun and useful python script -- I call it 'jackctl' -- it basically is a frontend to the jack tools 'jack_lsp' and 'jack_connect'. It's like 'qjackctl' , but since it's command line, no 'q' !!! get it here: http://www.akjmusic.com/software/jackctl20100526.py Why would I embark on writing such a script? Who would want to use this? You'll want to try this if one or any of the the following apply: 1) You don't want to have to install the entire QT toolkit for a single program. 2) If you like the command line, use a console, but still use jack often enough 3) You've used jack and 'jack_connect' through the command line before, but hated having to type the full name of the jack ports. 4) You've noticed that 'qjackctl' introduces CPU overhead and xruns you don't have when you use command-line jack, i.e. you are obsessed with the lowest possible latency 5) You want a fast, simple interface to connect jack ports that is even faster than a GUI---no need to point the mouse, just type two numbers and go! It's very simple. All you need is Python (and who doesn't have that on their machine). You put the script in your PATH, or link it/rename it, making sure it's exectuable. When you run it, you'll see a list of current numbered jack ports, and you can connect them by typing two numbers separated by a space. You can disconnect them by typing 'd' then the two numbers separated by a space. No hassles, and a nice feature is that it will protect you from making ear-blasting feedback connections. It's even quicker than qjackctl, b/c it takes more time to point your mouse at the ports in the GUI and then click 'connect' than it does to type two single-digit numbers and then hit return, yes? Let me know how you like it...I'm interested in reasonable feature requests. One potential TODO would be to make this script have a user-friendly way to start the jack daemon, but for now, I do that manually.... Enjoy, comments welcome! -- Aaron Krister Johnson http://www.akjmusic.com http://www.untwelve.org

15 years, 3 months

Re: [LAD] A little quiz about audio measurements...

by Ralf Mardorf

Olivier Guilyardi wrote: > On 05/28/2010 07:36 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> Folderol wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 28 May 2010 19:20:54 +0200 >>> Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Veronica Merryfield wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> You can't trust a loop back test. >>>>> Any instability or dither on the reference clock of card A (fifo >>>>> clocking say) is not going to show in a loop back test. >>>>> Vrnc >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Is Veronica Merryfield the winner? >>>> >>>> >>> I'm highly suspicious of the USB link, but can't quite put my finger >>> on why. >>> >>> >> Card A is the USB card. For USB there could be several issues, but I >> don't have knowledge about buffering etc., but I guess it's card A and >> that there's a "instability" = jitter. I don't know what dither for CLK >> is. I guess the winner is Veronica Merryfield. >> > > I mentioned the clock problem first ;-) However, I thought it the other way > around: I said that clocks being asynchronous that would generate artefacts, but > Veronica seems to say that these are hidden when using a single clock. > > That's pretty much the same thing to me :p > > -- > Olivier > Did you also say for what card? A or X? If so, is Oliver the winner? Btw.: Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Gabriel Beddingfield wrote: >> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield >> <gabrbedd(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> The 100 Hz (being 2x 50Hz, the power freq. in Italy) >>> suggests that it is probably related to some manner of >>> power supply. However, I have no theory why we're >>> getting 2x 50Hz (and I think I need one :-)). >>> >> >> Doh! When the AC wave is rectified, it results in a signal that is 2x >> the freq. because the negative part gets inverted. That's why we see >> 100 Hz instead of 50 Hz. >> >> -gabriel >> > > On card A or X? > Why AM and not additive signals? Is the jitter caused because of residual ripple? Summarized: Residual ripple for the DC could cause clock jitter and this for card A.

15 years, 3 months

Re: [LAD] A little quiz about audio measurements...

by fons＠kokkinizita.net

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 04:09:42PM +0200, Olivier Guilyardi wrote: > > <http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/quiz.html> > > Well, it looks to me like this is caused by the fact that the audio cards clocks > are not in sync. When you loopback card A with itself, both input and output are > sampled with the same clock. But when you plug the output of card A into card X, > you're dealing with two clocks which are not synchronized, and that result into > these "artefacts". If I'm right then you should observe some /similar/ issues > when repeating the experience with the cards inverted. The clocks don't matter, as the connection is via an analog signal. (sorry, no beer !) Ciao, -- FA O tu, che porte, correndo si ? E guerra e morte !

15 years, 3 months

Music, Undecidability, and the tiling problem (was Re: update: OT-ish: realtime 2d placement algorithms :-/)

by Niels Mayer

Related to my last reply to your question about "the tiling problem" vs undecidability... Ever since they started putting out relevant articles for computer scientists (in the last year), the American Math Society monthly "Notices" has gone from dull to fascinating; in the spirit of open-source, all the articles are available free and online. The latest ( http://www.ams.org/notices/201003/ ), focusing on Cryptography issues, has an excellent article that goes into the tiling problem in great detail -- and yet is a very clear explanation (IMHO) that isn't predicated on incomprehensible (to the general public) mathematical formalisms. http://www.ams.org/notices/201003/rtx100300343p.pdf Can't Decide? Undecide! by Chaim Goodman-Strauss See also: http://www.srcf.ucam.org/~jsm28/tiling/ I've posted previously about other excellent articles in a previous issue "Mathematics and the Arts" ( http://www.ams.org/notices/201001/ ) with a though-provoking introductory essay by Sir Michael Atiyah : > In the broad light of day mathemati- > cians check their equations and their > proofs, leaving no stone unturned in > their search for rigour. But, at night, > under the full moon, they dream, they > float among the stars and wonder at > the miracle of the heavens. They are > inspired. Without dreams there is no > art, no mathematics, no life. Niels http://nielsmayer.com PS: I think the "tiling problem" is actually a direct analogy to music making... which involves fitting together "tiles" (musical passages, patterns, etc) that are highly constrained in terms of "geometry" (pitch, key, time-signature, BPM, starting and ending pitches or chords). Music making is clearly an "undecidable" problem, which is where human creativity comes in. Can computers help us "tile" music more easily and therefore augment our musical creativity??

15 years, 3 months

Polling OSC controller

by Harry Van Haaren

Hey all, I've had a little idea that I think might be worth "implementing". This is it: Controllers, (in the musical sense like a MIDI controller knob), have always had a certain "update" period, ie MIDI cable 31250 baud, or from a MIDI file PPQ's etc.. you the the idea. What if we were to make a "callback-update" system, where the controller (read Arduino with a sensor attached) runs an OSC server, which whenever gets a */<arduinoName>/poll* command, returns the value of the sensor? I appreciate that for this example it would seem pretty pointless, as for 1 controller the overhead is gonna be bigger than the speed gained of just sending it every X ms. Concider a "big" ardour controller, with moving faders, leds, knobs etc I think this maybe be a great little system to allow OSC interfaces actually save the CPU some time polling the MIDI I/O subsystem, and take advantage of the Send -> Return style thing.. Of course to be all fancy, we could register a "send to" address, so many programs can access the same device, and have it only update the correct program, allowing each program handle the OSC messages however they want to. Also a */<ardName>/fader ( int ) *could be sent for each fader's position, */ardName/knob(int) *.... you get the idea. Ideas, responses, you've already done this, etc all welcome! -Harry

15 years, 3 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Linux-audio-dev