Hi guys, I just wanted to give an update on the integration of
librubberband into TerminatorX.
To understand rubberband, i wrote a small console Jack app that can play
wav files at diferent speeds, keeping pitch. It works well. The code is
attached.
I have a question to for the devs out there though: It seems to me that
i have to run process() a few times with a fixed blocksize before,
getRequiredSamples() returns something >0 in Realtime-mode. All other
options are default options. Is this true? I need some help on this
issue.
thanx Gerald
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Michael Ost:
>
> Paul Davis wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Michael Ost <most(a)museresearch.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We are considering using PortAudio for Linux hardware support (and
>>> Windows/Mac as well). What's the word on the quality, reliability,
>>> ease-of-programming, latency and performance in Linux?
>>
>> it works. its development seems to be an issue. it will not fix any of
>> the issues that you'd otherwise have to tackle on linux.
>
> Can you say more about that last sentence? I'm not quite getting it.
>
>> however, i'm puzzled: you guys are already running on linux - what are
>> you using now, and why the switch? cross-platform?
>
> Yes, cross platform. I'm investigating Windows/MacOS support. We've got
> our own portability layer, but it's only really implemented for Linux.
>
> BTW - I looked at JACK, but a quick google scan suggests that its not
> quite ready for prime time in Windows.
>
For what it's worth; Jack on Windows is used for providing sound
in two permanent art installations (http://www.intravisiongroup.com/).
One of them has been running for over two years now. The machines
are rebooted each night, and the oldest one is still using a version of
jack for windows released in 2007.
We've had no problem with jack for windows.
Hi guys, I just wanted to give an update on the integration of
librubberband into TerminatorX.
To understand rubberband, i wrote a small console Jack app that can play
wav files at diferent speeds, keeping pitch. It works well. The code is
attached.
I have a question to for the devs out there though: It seems to me that
i have to run process() a few times with a fixed blocksize before,
getRequiredSamples() returns something >0 in Realtime-mode. All other
options are default options. Is this true? I need some help on this
issue.
thanx Gerald
Hi guys, I just wanted to give an update on the integration of
librubberband into TerminatorX.
To understand rubberband, i wrote a small console Jack app that can play
wav files at diferent speeds, keeping pitch. It works well. The code is
attached.
I have a question to for the devs out there though: It seems to me that
i have to run process() a few times with a fixed blocksize before,
getRequiredSamples() returns something >0 in Realtime-mode. All other
options are default options. Is this true? I need some help on this
issue.
thanx Gerald
Hi everyone!
I had to download a file (split into several parts). Something at the end of
a few of these parts seems to have gone wrong. So I was wondering:
Is split the right utility to split a large binary file? Seemed so.
If I canget the other party to split the big chunks into smaller (say 1M)
chunks and upload the last 1M chunk of the original files, would there be a
way of merging these bits into my files.
It's essentially a big bzip2-file. Might we probably use a bzip2 utility to
get small chunks from the original. Because with bzip2recover I can tell which
blocks are damaged.
Thanks for any help!
Kindest regards
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
Hi,
I don't know who locked himself up after the 'LADI' discussion to
actually write an session handler for Linux. :) But in meantime Ladish
has added 'level 1' support:
"When ladish studio is being saved, applications that are run at level 1
receive the SIGUSR1 UNIX signal.
In signal handler function, a global variable can be set to mark that
save is needed. On next main loop iteration, the global variable is
checked and eventually save is made.
Save of the internal state can be made in a fixed file path, but it is
more useful to supply the file path through commandline. When starting,
app loads its internal state from the file specified. When saving, app
saves its internal state to the file specified."
http://ladish.org/wiki/level1
Ams, Jack_Mixer and calfjackhost (in progress) has already added level
1 support, and it seems to work OK (all though there are some
improvements ahead).
An advantage compared to 'LASH' or 'Ladish' support seems to be that
level 1 is pretty easy to implement by the application developers.
Now I'm wondering whether this 'level 1' could be a point of agreement
between different (potential) Session Handlers for Linux. If other
Session Handlers also adds 'level 1' support, it would make the
implementation of more then one Session Handler more easy and less
problematic for the Linux Audio world in my opinion. What do you think?
Regards,
\r
Hello, this is my very first non trivial program. It's a little python
script that uses sox to create an "audio collage" out of the mp3s in
the directories you pass to it on the command line. I know the code is
very crude, but nonetheless I'm very happy I made it work
Any suggestions on how I could get it to check recursively in the
directories?
renato
Hi there,
some of my plugins stopped working.
Are there any up to date examples of using MIDI ports for LV2 plugins
and/or can someone explain me if and what changed?
Thanks in advance
Uli
dear #lad'ies,
just wanted to say sorry for becoming infected by the (IMO) rogue like behaviour of some person(s) on IRC. hope you don't mind. i think there is nothing wrong with wanting to live in an intact world. and i don't think that i am crazy (or sociopathic) because i have hope that we are in fact living in an intact world right now. if I accept that the world isn't perfect and that "they" *lie* when they say that we are killing the *oh so sensitive* ecosystem BY JUST LIVING OUR LIVES, then I can say that this world is indeed intact and there is no polar bear or planet to worry about! - you see, in the end, all I want is my peace of mind and not being fooled by some *possibly* outdated, interest powered science which just makes me feel ashamed of what we, mankind, have managed!
how do you manage to live your life knowing that you are killing the ecosystem? how can you take all that bullshit without becoming cynical?
down to -20°C tonight in germany - thats reeaaaally hot!
