Hi,
I'm impressed by my recent discovery: non-daw and especially non-sequencer:
http://non.tuxfamily.org/
I love the design of the sequencer, it's very intuitive, userfriendly
and fast! Respect for that!
But I couldn't contact the author. So I was wondering, maybe he is on
this (lad) list?
I really like to know what his plans are with the apps and if he needs
support in some kind of way. Does he continue to work on it? (If not
that would be a real pity, cause this is not just another sequencer...
And then we might need some talented devs to fork it...)
Ok, I hope I will get some sign of life from the author soon...
Kind regards,
\rooz
Hello all,
Did anybody ever write a utulity to detect or count
denormals, NaN, Inf, etc. in a Jack stream ?
Ciao,
--
FA
Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia è troppo stretta e lunga.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
We've just added a new service to linuxaudio.org:
http://planet.linuxaudio.org/
..to make it easy to keep up on what people are up to in general and you
can browse the planet to see who you'd like to follow..
If you want your blog to be included in planet.linuxaudio.org, visit:
http://wiki.linuxaudio.org/wiki/planet
Kudos to Dave Robillard and Erik de Castro Lopo for suggesting and
pushing this idea.
Cheers!
robin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkr0IeMACgkQeVUk8U+VK0I+cACgrbxIg1I5wLzgoiGzWUrTnwWz
Qg4AoKr9xOfCO/ArCPN8x9nB3wxN7eKl
=zulW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hi!
Plugin and host authors and those who happen to know this: please reply
with at least 1 host or plugin(-set) and the provided or required
features/extensions.
I will then see that all that appears on the wiki.
If Dave provides a template, I should be able to write the RDF files for
the hosts.
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/
From: Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com>
> # In-place processing (reusing an input buffer as an output buffer)
must be supported by GMPI. Not critical, in fact VST has removed this
feature. Possible future enhancement.
>say it ain't so jeff! This is a ridiculous bit of cache thrashing. I
haven't followed VST carefully, and you certainly know more about it
than me, but i thought that steinberg did the opposite and got rid of
process_adding() and process_replacing() and required
process_replacing() ("in place") semantics?
Good point. In-place is super-easy to support anyhow, just use the same
buffer as both input and output.
Jeff
I have started a new project called Composite, which is planned to be a
sequencer for live-performance sequencing, sampling, and looping. One might
say that it will be like Ableton Live. It will be an LV2 host for synths and
effects, and will have a built-in sampler (which will probably be an LV2
plugin).
At this time, the project is in the planning stages.[1] Anyone who is
interested is invited to join the mailing list and share your thoughts and
opinions -- especially as it relates to UI and workflow.[2]
Links......
Project: http://gabe.is-a-geek.org/composite/
Mailing List: http://groups.google.com/group/composite-dev
Code: http://gitorious.org/composite
Specs (WIP): http://gabe.is-a-geek.org/composite/specification.html
FAQ: http://gabe.is-a-geek.org/composite/faq.html
Thanks especially to Patrick Shirkey for stirring things up.
Peace,
Gabriel
CC: LAU, LAD, LAA, Composite-Dev
[1] Strategy: Create a published spec. of what we want to
accomplish, and then get after it. There is currently
no code, but we plan to steal as much as we can.
[2] However, these will probably *not* change:
+ Will be monolithic. Let's not start a monolithic
vs. modular debate.
+ Will use Qt and C++.
>From: Chris Cannam <cannam(a)all-day-breakfast.com>
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 6:41 AM, Jeff McClintock <jef(a)synthedit.com> wrote:
> GMPI is quietly and successfully in use as the new native plugin format of
> SynthEdit.
>Interesting. Can you link to an API reference or the like?
Hi Chris,
The download link is below. The current version is tested on Windows only,
I'm pretty sure it's potentially Linux friendly because it's a refinement of
the original prototype which was jointly developed with Tim Hocken on Linux.
Any MSWindows-specific, or SynthEdit-specific features are implemented as
extensions. I periodically check it compiles cleanly with GCC.
http://www.synthedit.com/sdk.htm
-----------------------------
From: Emanuel Rumpf <xbran(a)web.de>
>From the KVR site:
"Like MIDI, GMPI will be license free and royalty free."
>"...and will cost you ~ $88 to acquire."
My addition.
>FLOSS people - let's rather ignore GMPI as long as we can.
The prototype was developed by members of the GMPI mailing list who are not
members of the MMA.
"Req 113: The GMPI SDK must be released under a license with similar terms
to the BSD license."
It is under the BSD license, it costs nothing to acquire or to use.
Every plugin I've written with GMPI (aka SEM) is also BSD and source code
is available with the SDK. My own plugins are aimed at modular synthesis
though, so maybe not widely useful.
------------------------------
I'm don't believe GMPI has much chance of widespread popularity, much of the
design was considered too radical, e.g. my proposal to ditch MIDI. MIDI
support *was* eventually included as an option, but I also support MIDI-less
synths controlled via polyphonic control-ports.
I will continue using my branch of GMPI, it's far cleaner, more advanced and
more efficient (for me) than anything else.
Here are the official GMPI requirements...
http://retropaganda.info/archives/gmpi/gmpi-requirements-2005-04-05-final-dr
aft.html
Here (bottom of page )... list which GMPI requirements are currently
supported.
http://www.synthedit.com/sdk3_docs/index.htm
Jeff McClintock.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm just curious what your long-time experiences with these
gui-libraries are.
Considering to use one of these two but can't really decide.
But I do not want to switch in a year or two...
Thanks for your advices!
Christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkp/wE0ACgkQVC26eJ+o0+2UQACePLcVXkXSwPygZrC1sQnDUWC0
hk0AmgNmgru7KzOfYCkGppoqldsam5GH
=BzmB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Stefano D'Angelo <zanga.mail(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/11/8 Nedko Arnaudov <nedko(a)arnaudov.name>:
>> Â * Dynmanifest support in version 5 (and maybe even for latest git) is
>> Â for an old version of dynmanifest.
>
> Git version is for the current version ;-)
What is dynmanifest? I can't see it in the wiki.
(changing subject line to avoid polluting thread)
Chris