Dear All
I am promoting the development and manufacture of a new music keyboard
capable of playing all traditional and some new musical scales.
Descriptions of both can be found on my website at:
http://52midnight.com
The new design has been placed in the public domain, and I am seeking
expressions of interest in persuading manufacturers to design and market
the new keyboards.
I believe that such instruments could initiate something of a musical
renaissance and a range of new musical styles. It would also be of great
value in training choirs to sing the pure, untempered intervals of
traditional music rather than the tempered intervals of standard
keyboards. I'm hoping for some assistance from the Linux Audio community
in moving this forward, and would be very pleased to hear from anyone
interested
Carl Adams.
If one were to build a "kernel" to a digital audio workstation that was
itself a bare-bones LV2 host, could things like audio tracks, midi
tracks, and mixer channels and the like be built as LV2 plug-ins?
I've been thinking a lot about a comment made a while back about how
monolithic applications are very ill-suited to the open-source method of
development. So I got to thinking about how an operating system works
(at a high level; my meager coding skills are no matches for people
well-versed in operating systems) and began to ask some questions.
This "kernel" would have to handle things like audio routing, and
message passing between two "processes" (the LV2 plug-ins), and would
jockey the audio in and out of the plug-in graph. It would need to
support the GUI and event extensions, and probably a few others, at the
very least.
The hope might be that if such a kernel could be made, it might then be
a lot easier for many people to contribute the small pieces that would
make for a usable application. Please feel free to consider this
mindless brainstorming if you'd like.
-- Darren
Well, no response on the user list. Maybe someone here has an idea -
does the Tascam US-1641 work with Linux/ALSA? I'm assuming not and have
written a nice email to Tascam asking for a little information. I'm
assuming they're not going to be very helpful but it's worth a shot.
Jan
--
Jan 'Evil Twin' Depner
http://www.thecfband.com
"Microsoft has a new version out, Windows XP, which according to
everybody is the 'most reliable Windows ever.' To me, this is like
saying that asparagus is 'the most articulate vegetable ever.'"
Dave Barry
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:31:49AM +0100, forum::für::umläute wrote:
> is the TetraProc A2B converter available somewhere for download?
> i couldn't find it at
> http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/downloads/index.html
>
> i would like to try it with a soundfield mic rather urgently...
It's not on the downloads page because using it makes
sense only if you have the calibration for you microphone
- TetraProc requies around 40 paramters. This calibration
data can be derived only from IR measurements.
It is possible to use 'standard' values, given the
FR and polar pattern of the mic, but results will
not be very good.
Which microphone would you want to use ?
Would it be possible to measure it, if I
tell you how to do it ?
Ciao,
--
FA
Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica
Parma, Italia
O tu, che porte, correndo si ?
E guerra e morte !
hi fons, list.
is the TetraProc A2B converter available somewhere for download?
i couldn't find it at
http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/downloads/index.html
i would like to try it with a soundfield mic rather urgently...
fgmasdr
IOhannes
Hi,
I've been toying recently with the X window test extension (which
allows the user to simulate input events) and I've decided to create a
bigger project that uses it. My project idea would be a unix daemon
that reads data from the sound card, gets the dominant frequency and
then reports a key corresponding to this data.
Unfortunately, I don't know the theory of spectrum analysis and I
don't think I could come up with a high-performance spectrum analyzer
in reasonable time.
So, my question is : do you know a good spectrum analyzer, preferably
written in C that I could modify ?
Regards,
Karim
Hi,
This might be of interest for the people on this mailing list...
We have an open position for VoIP Quality Specialist in our team at
Nokia / MaemoSW in Helsinki, Finland.
If this sounds interesting, please take a look at following link. As I
seemingly cannot link to the actual job page in question, I can only
link to the main page http://www.nokia.com/imaginemaemo , and ask to
look up for Id: VoIP Quality Specialist-HEL000001K9 on the listing. At
least currently seems to be on the first page. There might be also other
interesting positions there...
Best regards,
- Jussi
Hello all!
I'm just a little worried abot my system security. I wonder is the following
normal:
# ps -ax
[...]
8226 ? Ss 0:00 sshd: unknown [priv]
8227 ? S 0:00 sshd: unknown [net]
Just before that I only saw "sshd [accept]" and "sshd [net]".
Shutdown sshd and made new password and restarted sshd. Now it's the same.
Can I easily check where it's coming from and what it's doing. I don't see
anything besides those two lines. No other strange processes.
Sorry to have bothered you with that.
Kindest regards
Julien
--------
Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
the Linux TextBased Studio guide
======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
http://www.juliencoder.de
On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Ken Restivo wrote:
>
>
> Very cool.
>
> This is totally random, but it reminds me, 10 years ago, when I used
> to work on PC's back when laptops had floppy drives, and before Linux
> supported a lot of hardware, I'd keep a DOS floppy handy for
> troubleshooting purposes. It was called, of course, "DOS BOOT".
>
You probably meant to write ""DAS BOOT""...? :-)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Das_boot
>
> -ken
>
Fons Adriaensen:
>
>> ... And if it's a public server,
>> I'd rather not have anybody logging in through ssh who is not capable
>of
>> dealing with key logins. I disabled password logins through ssh on
>> my public machines.
>
>That seems to be the best way to deal with it.
>
>A weakly related OT question:
>
>I need to set up a machine as a router. One side is
>a fixed public IP address, the other side is a local
>net using 192.168.1.x. I want to give internet access
>to the machines on the local net, so this requires
>(AFAIK) NAT. Anyone has a pointer to a good tutorial
>about how to do this ?
I once put the lines belo into an init file to do this.
I don't know what happens, I just copied from a post
found on the internet, one like this. :-)
In case there is a security problem with this method,
someone will hopefully write a comment about it. I think
eth0 is connected to the world, and eth1 is
connected to the local network, but it could
have been the other way too.
/sbin/rmmod ipchains
/sbin/modprobe iptable_nat
/sbin/modprobe ip_conntrack_ftp
/sbin/modprobe ip_nat_ftp
/sbin/iptables -F -t filter
/sbin/iptables -Z -t filter
/sbin/iptables -X -t filter
/sbin/iptables -F -t nat
/sbin/iptables -Z -t nat
/sbin/iptables -X -t nat
/sbin/iptables -P INPUT ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -P FORWARD ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -P OUTPUT ACCEPT
/sbin/iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -m state --state NEW,INVALID -j DROP
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
# enable forwarding
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
# drop spoof packets
echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/rp_filter