Linux-audio-dev

linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

7513 discussions

by Jay Vaughan

On Jan 22, 2008, at 2:45 PM, M-.-n wrote: > more linux music on the go ? > http://www.openpandora.org > http://pandora.bluwiki.com/ definitely one to watch .. i hear a rumour that devboards are out and about for this already .. should be good to go in march if all goes well, and the world doesn't slide into a mass depression in the meantime .. ;) also, the neo1973-GTA02 version should be a nice little machine for portable music-making, soon enough. i'm having a blast with pulseaudio on my gta01 .. gonna be nice to have some power increase (and new graphics) in the new version. insmod gadget-audio for the win, w00t! ; -- Jay Vaughan

17 years, 8 months

Hello.

by alex stone

Hello all, my name's Alex Stone, and Benno From Linuxsampler pointed me in this direction to see what you guys who build stuff are up to. Frankly I've been amazed at the talent on display to use a phrase. Linux audio has come a long way since i last peeked in some 8 or 10 years ago. I'm currrently usiing a programme called Reaper, in wine in Linux, but i am keen to see a complete native solution come to maturity. I've had the privilege of communicating with some of you already, and as my linux journey is a recent one, i've been assisted, and encouraged by some great fellas, who know their stuff. Anyway, the introductions are done, and handshakes are made. I hope i can contribute something here from a user's perspective, and as someone fairly well versed in using audio and production programmes on the 'other side of the fence'. I've finally seen the light, and gained my freedom. As a former orchestral player, i'm more inclined to use programmes from a classical composer's perspective. and as some of you know already, i've tried to convey what it's like to write classical music with a computer, and the challenges that go with that, the biggest of all usually being the number of audio or midi ports available, and the capability possible for using a large number of instruments, often with several for one section with variations in articulation. My respects and thanks to those who have helped and encouraged so far, and i hope i can give something back as my knowledge continues to grow.. Alex Stone.

17 years, 8 months

Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] JACK & MIDI

by Julien Claassen

Hi again! Well Phil you said, that the new protocol wouldn't be understood by anything. So why not first take it easy and take a look at what already exists. OSC was mentioned here a couple of times? Might that be an idea? And about the two APIs: why not? If you think about it thorroughly I'm sure one can come up with a protocol, of which MIDI is a subset. Thus some interaction between to apps (one using MIDI, one using the new thing) could be possible. At the moment we have audio and MIDI ports, add a third kind of ports. And thus if you use plain old MIDI there's no more overhead, than there should be. Kindest regards Julien -------- Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles) ======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ======== http://ltsb.sourceforge.net the Linux TextBased Studio guide ======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: ======= http://www.juliencoder.de

17 years, 8 months

[RELEASE] jack-audio-connection-kit 0.109.0

by Pieter Palmers

Dear Linux Audio users, A new jack release (0.109.0) is available: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=39687 Enjoy, Pieter (Releaser-ad-interim) Changelog ========= API changes: * add jack_thread_wait API * remove port_(un)lock functions * add new time APIs * add port aliases * add new client registration callback * add port connect callback Backends: * ALSA: fix for use of snd_pcm_link * ALSA: hardware jack-midi support * ALSA: fix for enabling big-endian 16bit format discovery * ALSA: hardware jack-midi support * FreeBoB: fix deallocation segfault * FireWire: add 'firewire' backend for use with FFADO * OSS: add support for proper triggering in OSS driver when in full duplex mode * ALSA: fix illegal use of ALSA API * OSS: disable software mixing and samplerate conversions on OSS 4.x * CoreAudio: fix sample rate management Other * add JACK_PROMISCUOUS_SERVER handling * make /dev/shm the default tmpdir * add -Z flag to cancel zombification on timeout * add per-port update total latency * increment default watchdog timeout to 10sec

17 years, 8 months

Re: [LAD] JACK & MIDI

by t_w_＠freenet.de

Fons Adriaensen wrote: > Seriously, there are three things that I profoundly dislike in MIDI. > > 1. The limited precision of almost all values, 7 bits or 14 with a > kludge (but even this kludge is not available in any standard > way for e.g. individual note frequencies). > > 2. Note events are identified by their frequency. > > 3. The only thing that can actually refer back to a note on event > is it's corresponding 'note off' message. It's not possible to > send a controller value that refers to a previous note-on event. I'm quite sure many of us would like to see this limitations go away, including Dave. Being able to work with MIDI hardware is reason enough to have MIDI sequencing. That doesn't rule out to have something else, additionaly. How about you work out a proposal? Or better yet a draft implementation, as we all have seen how far one gets with talking ... I guess you have the technical and musical expertise and maybe the motivation thanks to your specific interests. Once you have completed something, perhaps someone steps up to crticise it. -- Thorsten Wilms

17 years, 8 months

Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] JACK & MIDI

by Pieter Palmers

Phil Rhodes wrote: > It seems to me dangerously like you're running off down a road familiar > to Linux - create something that's a fantastic engineering solution and > runs at a million miles an hour on a 286, but which is completely > pointless and unusable because it won't talk to anything. indeed, but do you have an alternative? It's sort-of a chicken-and-egg issue. Back when jack was conceived, there were no jack clients either. So you didn't have anything to 'talk to' either (important exception: a soundcard). If we can come up with something 'better than MIDI', it could be interesting. Especially since these days a lot of audio stuff doesn't leave the pc anyway. The only thing tying us to MIDI are the external devices. And if the 'better than MIDI' can be downgraded to plain MIDI you have something to talk with. Greets, Pieter

17 years, 8 months

JACK & MIDI

by Fons Adriaensen

With the release of Jack 0.109 we now have a (hopefully) stable API for midi-over-jack. This set me to consider what would be required to modify Aeolus to use this system. And I did not like the conclusions. Is it a good idea to insert a 30-year old data format that mixes real-time and general data on a single stream into a real-time audio processing API ? I don't think so. 1. Note on/off and controller events now can be 'sample accurate'. That's nice to have. But a) they are not and never will be 'sample accurate' if they come from a HW midi device, and b) if they are generated in software then you can have, and for some applications you actually want much more finer grained timestamps and controller values. So it's a solution that in one case is plain overkill, and in the other it's just not good enough. 2. *All* MIDI data now has to pass through the RT-audio audio thread, even if it's not related to any RT operations at all, and in many cases, not even meant for the receiving application. What is the poor process callback to do with sysex memory dumps, sample downloads, and in most cases, even program changes ? The only thing it can do is get rid of this ballast as fast as possible, dumping it in a buffer to be processed by some lower-priority process, and hoping it will not be blocked or forced to discard data. Forcing a critical RT-thread to waste its time in this way is IMHO not good program design, not even if the overhead can be tolerated. That sort of data should never go there. Some sort of solution could be to let the MIDI backend do at least part of the filtering - it could have several jack-midi ports corresponding to a single raw midi input and e.g. separate note on/off, controller events, and sysex messages. An app that wants to receive all can still do so without any significant overhead, it just needs a few more ports. And once e,g. note on/off and controller updates have dedicated ports, there is no more need to keep the MIDI format with all its limitations. This will be enough for some flames, so I'll stop here :-) -- FA Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica Parma, Italia Lascia la spina, cogli la rosa.

17 years, 8 months

Re: [LAD] [CinCVS] Fwd: I believe in cinelerra

by Richard Spindler

2008/1/19, Fred Williams <fred(a)fredwilliams.ca>: > Fine a wiki for the developers and a web site are good ideas. > Developers may come and go and getting them up to speed on the project > requires documentation and possibly training. Internal communications > is vital and every developer should be in almost constant contact with > the group to make sure everybody's on the same project and knows what is > going on. This synergistic culture is vital to such a team. It's in > everybody's interest that all the other team members understand the > project perfectly. Time spent bringing a new member up to speed is not > wasted. A developer's bulletin board is essential. Well defined > standard interfaces for code is also essential and design changes must > be tracked and approved by the core development team. Things like that > ensure a solid program. > I could get behind a project like that. Ok, so what needs to be done to get such a project rolling? The following is my opinion, and of course everyone is free to argue otherwise. ;-) When "planning" a project, I prefer to make an Assessment of the resources that I have available first, because I somehow like to be realistic about what really "can" be done instead of building castles out of air and then being disappointed that it did not work out. So, this "Project" seems to be about "Code", programming code and such. So, while there is certainly a lot of code already out there that can be reused, someone has to fit it together and someone has to fill in the missing parts. So this project will involve coding. So we need "Coders". This is how open source projects work, they need coders. There are many people with ideas, but someone has to code it and generally, those people are a scarce resource. So, in planning this stuff the first thing to find out is who are the coders, and what are they willing to do. Making big plans and then expecting outsiders to jump in and start coding is an approach that has proven not to work, at least as far as my experience goes. Maybe at one point outsiders will come and start contributing, but for that to happen, a solid core is needed, something that is of value to contributors. And btw. I also believe that making plans that reach too far into the future are very, very risky, especially if one relies on volunteers. Better make a small proposal for a well defined problem, for which a solution is immediatly useful. Then try to get it solved as fast as possible, before people loose interest, and then try to "infect" as many peer groups as possible with the solution to create an "eco-system" where the solution can sustain itself. Then fit that part into the big picture, and move on to the next little puzzle part. So, I am volunteering to do stuff, who else is? Cheers -Richard PS.: the discussion is distributed among the following mailinglist, so check the archives: https://www.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/piksel http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra -- Are you teaching the What and the How but without the Why and the When?

17 years, 8 months

FW: [piksel] Fwd: [estudiolivre] I believe in cinelerra

by Ivica Ico Bukvic

This looks like an opportunity to beef up audio side of things as well as foster development of another powerful foss multimedia software. See below for more info. Best wishes, Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A. Director, Linuxaudio.org Virginia Tech Dept. of Music - 0240 Blacksburg, VA 24061 (540) 231-6139 (540) 231-5034 (fax) ico(a)linuxaudio.org www.linuxadio.org -----Original Message----- From: piksel-bounces(a)bek.no [mailto:piksel-bounces@bek.no] On Behalf Of Fabianne Balvedi Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 7:05 PM To: p1k53l workshop Subject: [piksel] Fwd: [estudiolivre] I believe in cinelerra ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Leo germani <leogermani(a)gmail.com> Date: Jan 18, 2008 7:53 PM Subject: [estudiolivre] I believe in cinelerra To: estudiolivre <estudiolivre(a)lists.riseup.net>, Felipe Fonseca <felipefonseca(a)gmail.com> What Develop cinelerra as a professional free/libre video editing tool. Why Cinelerra is the most powerfull free software for video editting we have nowadays. Although it has many resources and that it is far more advanced than any other Open Source video software, its development is very slow and has no sponsor. Its main developer, Heroine Warrior, do not mantain a SVN or a mailing list. The last official release was last july and there is no sign of a upcoming version of cinelerra. They usually publish a new release every six month or so but do it only for their own needs and do not talk with the community much. Few developers mantain a fork called "Community Version". All out of volunteer work they mantain a SV a mailing list and an online wiki. They also fix some bugs and add some features to the code. This desorganized development results in a mess. There is no official stable release and package for the distributions, and cinelerra is now known as very hard to install and unstable software (although it got really better last year). Also, first contact with cinelerra is usually disappointing because of a not well resolved interface and also because of big flaws it has on some funcionalities. With all that said, it happens that we have a software that is, at the same time, powerfull enough to do any kind of editing, but weak enough to have very basic issues of usability. And the feeling all advanced users have is: We are pretty close to have high standard software! To learn more about the mess, take a look at this page: http://cv.cinelerra.org/about.php Many of the actions described on this plan are already been done by many people, but in a rather heroic way. If this people got motivated, organized and _paid_, cinelerra would increase its quality dramatically in a short period of time. The Plan 1. Get the community together The community of developers today is very small and spread, and cinelerra has no road map. First thing to do is gather this people to discuss about the future of cinelerra, identify the main flaws and its solution, make a plan to organize the place and set up for new features. Cinelerra needs a project leader, an interface designer, and more people with defined roles that should be choosen on this meeting. Developers of other softwares are also welcome. Cinelerra is, so far, the only video free editing video editing software with professional approach, but it could share a lot of things with other software, such as effects, for example, that shoul be usable in any video software, just like we have LADSPA for audio. There is already a video effect standar called Frei0r that cinelerra does not support. 2. Diagnostics Cinelerra code is not very well documented, so few people have the idea of how tuff is to deal with it. Second step is to see what must be done so we can invite more people to colaborate with the code. Documentation, refactoring, etc. It also has to work on the API so other people can write plugins and effects. In other words, lots of work that are a pain in the ass but has to be done in order to advance properly. And passion has a limit. There must be people getting money to work on that. 3. Make a plan Based on the diagnostics and on researches with users and other video editing tools, define how cinelerra will look and act in a not so distant future. With that goal in mind, make a reasonable plan to make it happen. 3. Set up a core development team No secret here. Few people dedicated to make it happen, including an interface designer. 4. Bounties The core team can offer bounties for parts of the job they choose. This will attracat more developers to the community. 5. Attract contributors Mantain a nice looking website, a wiki, tools for easy translation of the interface and of the online documentation, etc. are goos strategies to attract people to contribute. Its also important to find people to package the software for different distributions. -- leogermani.pirex.com.br leogermani.estudiolivre.org ________________________________ Lista de Discussão do Estúdio Livre portal colaborativo -> http://www.estudiolivre.org/ sobre esta lista -> http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/estudiolivre -- Fabianne Balvedi GNU User #286985 http://fabs.estudiolivre.org "As contradições mais agudas da vida humana não foram feitas para serem solucionadas, mas vividas com plena ciência de seu carater paradoxal." Isma'il Al-Faruqi _______________________________________________ piksel mailing list piksel(a)bek.no https://www.bek.no/mailman/listinfo/piksel http://www.piksel.no

17 years, 8 months

MidiShare problem on AMD64

by Dave Phillips

Greetings, I'm trying to get IRCAM's Open Music 5.2.1 running here, but I'm having various difficulties. For now, I'll focus on this one: I'm trying to build MidiShare (it's required by OM) on my 64-bit machine (64Studio), and I've got this far : make -C kernel make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dlphilp/src/openmusic/midishare-1.91-linux2.6-src/src/linux/kernel' for x in atomic/lffifoIntel.c atomic/lflifoIntel.c Clients/msAlarms.c Clients/msAppls.c Clients/msConnx.c Clients/msFilter.c Clients/msMail.c Clients/msTasks.c Clients/msXmtRcv.c Kernel/msHandler.c Kernel/msInit.c Kernel/msSmpte.c Kernel/msTime.c Memory/msEvents.c Memory/msFields.c Memory/msMemory.c Memory/msSeq.c Sorter/msSorter.c Drivers/msDriver.c; do ln -sf ../../common/$x `basename $x`; done make modules -C /usr/src/linux SUBDIRS=/home/dlphilp/src/openmusic/midishare-1.91-linux2.6-src/src/linux/kernel make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.21-1-multimedia-amd64' CC [M] /home/dlphilp/src/openmusic/midishare-1.91-linux2.6-src/src/linux/kernel/msLoader.o /home/dlphilp/src/openmusic/midishare-1.91-linux2.6-src/src/linux/kernel/msLoader.c:1: sorry, unimplemented: code model kernel not supported in PIC mode /home/dlphilp/src/openmusic/midishare-1.91-linux2.6-src/src/linux/kernel/msLoader.c:1: error: code model ‘kernel’ not supported in the 64 bit mode make[3]: *** [/home/dlphilp/src/openmusic/midishare-1.91-linux2.6-src/src/linux/kernel/msLoader.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** [_module_/home/dlphilp/src/openmusic/midishare-1.91-linux2.6-src/src/linux/kernel] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.21-1-multimedia-amd64' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dlphilp/src/openmusic/midishare-1.91-linux2.6-src/src/linux/kernel' make: *** [kernel] Error 2 Has anyone ever compiled MidiShare for a 64-bit machine, and if so, how ? I'm using Albert Graef's patches for MidiShare 1.91, but they don't address the 64-bit problem. Is MidiShare even maintained anymore ? I had troubles compiling 1.91 on my 32-bit box too, and since it's required for Open Music I'd like to figure out how to build it on both boxes here. Some time ago I did write to GRAME re: MidiShare development but received no response. Any suggestions ? Best, dp

17 years, 8 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Linux-audio-dev