Hi all,
I am trying to record audio from my STM webcam the driver for it's sound card's driver is loaded automatically as snd-usb-audio.
But When I try to record through sound recorder, it did't record anything.
On seeing at the catc traces I came to know that the sound recorder even don't set the streaming alternates.
Any suggestions?
Best Regards
----
Bharat Singh Gusain
ST Microelectronics
HPC/PMG-Imaging RD&I
Plot no-1, Knowledge Park III
Greater Noida - 201308, India
Mobile - 9911121667
PSTN: 0120-4003414
PH: 0120-2352999
EXTN: 2772
www.st.com
Hi,
maybe it's just another of my dumb questions, however I would like to
know whether it is happened to you that a sound processing plugin
(LADSPA, LV2, VST, etc.) crashed (segm. faults, etc.).
In such case, can you estimate how often does it happen that such
plugins are misprogrammed?
Thanks in advance,
Stefano
On 1/25/07, Carlo Capocasa <capocasa(a)gmx.net> wrote:
> > We need more moderators on the list, mail me ;-)
>
> Hey ho, thought police! Let us all think right and be right and have
> someone else decide on what that 'right' actually means!
>
> What I'm getting at is, you have absolutely no way of knowing whether or
> not Israel actually is an Apartheid state, or how that might or might
> not be relevant to this list.
>
> What's with the people who might want to write a song about Israel
> and/or Apartheid? Oh right, that's not important, we have more important
> things to do, we are all about National Security, and stray thinkers are
> a danger, so we must silence them with whatever means necessary to us.
>
> So in come the moderators and you have to watch your step around here
> before you say anything about Jews or you get busted.
>
> Now personally I couldn't give a bit more about what Jews aren't or are
> doing, but it seems every time you mention them everybody goes nuts.
> What goes? What's REALLY behind this?
>
> Carlo
>
>
I think I own everyone an apology for being part of all the fuss that
has been going on the list for a few days now.
When I wrote the above quoted sentence I did not imagine the
(disproportionate) consequences this would have, and more importantly
never intended to imply that a moderator was here to control if what
was said on the list was right or wrong thinking. Although I do think
that as a moderator and administrator myself I need to make sure a
certain ethic is respected, the best way to deal with the original
problematic message was just to ignore it, since the replies only
caused a flame war.
Concerning the need to decrease the work load of moderating the list,
I propose another approach :
As discussed previously on the list, we will certainly move to
linuxaudio.org. Let's use this opportunity to tune mailman to our
needs. There are not so much actual message that fall into the
'in-need-of-moderation' category. There are two actually : non-member
messages and HTML messages. The biggest part of the job is to filter
spam. My idea is to find a way to tweak (or apply an existing patch
to) mailman so that messages marked as spam get discarded
automatically, and also to be able to feed spamassassin with new spam
samples directly from the moderation page.
If you are willing to help, if you know of an existing solution or if
you happen to have ideas concerning this, please, drop me an email. It
is as of this momment the best way to help, and is the first step
towards making moderation faster for every one.
Again accept all my appologies.
__________________
Marc-Olivier Barre,
Markinoko.
HI
Just wondering if this will get through from my Gmail act.
I have loaded 64studio onto my only new SATA drive and now cannot boot at
all ( black screen cursor only)
Anyone any idea how I goot the machine?
Or do I need to reinstall it all again. ( It did ask to install grub to the
MBR and I said yes)
Many thanks
Bob
wavesound
On a side note there is a discussion on the freebob list of whether to add a
control api to Jack or just for freebob.
On Thursday 25 January 2007 04:40, linux-audio-dev-request(a)music.columbia.edu
wrote:
> On 24 Jan 2007, at 16:02, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
> > Well... I know I'm quite a boring person, but I need some informations
> > for my project and so I'm going to stress you a bit ;-)
> > I'm wondering if JACK is suitable to transfer non-audio data beetween
> > applications (my particular case is to transfer control data to
> > processing plugins). Is that "naturally" possible, is it an hack or is
> > it impossible at all?
>
> You could encode control data in the audio stream, or build a bespoke Â
> JACK that add additional data types, or you could use the nascent Â
> JACK-MIDI stuff.
>
> You could also look at OSC, which, depending on your syncronisation Â
> needs could be a better fit.
>
> > And another thing (I'm too lazy to check it out myself :-P): does jack
> > transfers data by copying or uses something like shared memory or
> > whatever?
>
> It uses shared memory where possible.
>
> - Steve
--
When it comes to broken marriages most husbands will split the blame --
half his wife's fault, and half her mother's.
Hi all,
I'm quite new to sound-related programming, but however I have an idea
which could interest some of you, but I don't know if it's possible to
develop such thing.
What I'd like to work on is a sound processing architecture (LADSPA,
VST, DSSI, etc.) wrapper, which hides the details of a particular
implementation to audio program developers.
The whole thing could be made of a library to be used directly by
audio developers in their programs, one or more configuration files
used to retrieve directories in which plugins are placed and other
stuff, and modules which contain implementation details for each
processing architecture.
The library could also contain some code to "trap" particular kinds of
functions (for example Xlib functions to embed plugin GUIs inside
programs).
I think that the advantage of all of these stuff is to enable programs
to use any kind of processing object (they could not only be loadable
modules, but also text files or whatever), to collect "information" on
how to implement a certain processing object type just in one place,
and, last but not least, to ease creation of new standards and
comparison of existing ones.
What do you think about it?
Sincerely,
Stefano D'Angelo
http://www.freshpatents.com/Low-latency-real-time-audio-streaming-dt2006040…
in which Microsoft patents designs partially implemented by OSS 10 years
ago and fully implemented by ALSA 5 years ago. Wrapping this up in
windows API nonsense obscures the basic fact this design is not
innovative in any way unless compared only to existing Windows audio
driver architectures.
Paul Davis:
>
> On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 16:06 +0100, Jay Vaughan wrote:
>> At 20:08 +0100 22/1/07, Stefano D'Angelo wrote:
>>> What I'd like to work on is a sound processing architecture (LADSPA,
>>> VST, DSSI, etc.) wrapper, which hides the details of a particular
>>> implementation to audio program developers.
>>
>> Nice idea. Already done:
>>
>> http://teragon.org/products/PluginCore/
>>
>>> What do you think about it?
>>
>> Would be nice if there were a GPL effort in the same way ..
>
> ARDOUR::Plugin ?
>
> which currently wraps VST, LADSPA and will soon do either LV2 or
> DSSI ...
>
> yeah, ok, so its partly in jest, but not entirely.
>
Another one is the "Juce Audio Plugin Framework", which
wraps VSTs, RTAS and AudioUnits.
http://www.rawmaterialsoftware.com/juce/download.php
It doesn't support ladspa though, but Julian said that he should
look at LV2. (He also said that he hadn't heard of LV2 before,
so maybe he hasn't heard about ladspa either. :-) So if someone
request ladspa, he might do that as well...)