Well, mixed results tonight.
I was able to get some sound to go across the ADAT
cables from the PC to the AW4416. But not good sound.
On the bright side, I think I more or less understand
connecting things up with jack, ecasound, and so on.
On the bad side, so far it's not working too well.
I monitored things with "jackmeter" and this meter
registered peaks near 0dB for the stuff I was playing
with ecasound, and pretty high levels for the most part.
On the AW4416, the levels were registering between -30dB
and -48dB. I guess I don't understand how ADAT works.
I was under the impression the signal going across the
cables was digital -- and so to get a reduction in levels
like that, I would expect some digital numbers would have
to go from being big numbers to being small numbers, which
seems unlikely thing to happen to numbers encoded as pulses
going down a cable. So I conclude I don't know how ADAT
works, except it's not as I imagined it did.
Oh, and besides a drastic loss of signal level, the signal
was distorted strangely. Hard to describe. This may be
due to xruns... I haven't got things to work without xruns
yet, but that shouldn't cause a drop in levels, right? Just
kind of choppiness, dropouts, crappy sound, right?
Transfering from the AW4416 to the PC did not work at all.
on capture_1 and capture_2, I got very low level white noise
apparently. Are those the s/pdif ports? On the other
channels input was dead silence.
I tried both ADAT ports on the RME board, with similar results
on each. I tried swapping the two ADAT cables in case one of
the cables was bad... this did not seem to make a difference.
Maybe the RME just transmits harder than the Yamaha, so it's
signal makes it across (just barely, crossing the finish
line at -48dB) while the yamaha's signal dies.
I did change the RME's frequency to 44.1kHz in qjackctl's
setup window.
Maybe there are some clues in here:
[root@zuul R15]# cat /proc/asound/R15/rme9652
RME Digi9636 (Rev 1.5) (Card #2)
Buffers: capture f6a00000 playback f6400000
IRQ: 10 Registers bus: 0xea000000 VM: 0xf88a2000
Control register: 48029
Latency: 1024 samples (2 periods of 4096 bytes)
Hardware pointer (frames): 1024
Passthru: no
Clock mode: autosync
Pref. sync source: ADAT1
ADAT1 Input source: ADAT1 optical
IEC958 input: Internal
IEC958 output: Coaxial only
IEC958 quality: Consumer
IEC958 emphasis: off
IEC958 Dolby: off
IEC958 sample rate: error flag set
ADAT Sample rate: 44100Hz
ADAT1: No Lock
ADAT2: Sync
ADAT3: No Lock
Timecode signal: no
Punch Status:
1: off 2: off 3: off 4: off 5: off 6: off 7: off 8: off
9: off 10: off 11: off 12: off 13: off 14: off 15: off 16: off
17: off 18: off
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Hi Nedko,
A while ago I proposed merging documentation efforts of the community,
spearheaded by Dave's now unfortunately cancelled 2nd edition of his
venerable book. Linuxaudio.org is already trying to head in this direction
and we are currently in the process of assembling a team to utilize
presently empty sub-domain docs.linuxaudio.org which ought to be perfect for
this purpose (rather than hijacking lau faq site which has its own specific
purpose). One possible scenario (which FWIW I very much favor) is to have a
Wiki page that would sum up all of the projects listed on Dave's site as
well as those that are also relevant but have not yet made it there. Using a
similar template format we should provide a continuously updated
consolidated resource for all Linux audio users, and more importantly all
Linux distributions to reference. As such, we are also hoping to attract
various distros to contribute to the same documentation project. So far
goto10 guys (dyne creators) have expressed interest in the idea...
Best wishes,
Ico
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nedko Arnaudov [mailto:nedko@arnaudov.name]
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:09 PM
> To: ico(a)linuxaudio.org
> Subject: linux audio wiki
>
> There was a talk in #lad and there is idea to have general purpose wiki
> for linux audio. http://lau.linuxaudio.org/faq looks perfect except that
> it is "user" faq oriented. What you think about having "lau faq"
> category with all current lau faq pages in it and using the mediawiki
> installation as general purpose linux audio wiki. Such wiki will include
> user and developer oriented pages. It will include also information
> about belonging of software to groups like lv2, dssi, jack, alsa midi,
> jack midi, jack audio, sequencer, host, etc. Something similar (software
> categorization/grouping) is made at http://linux-sound.org/ and
> http://lawiki.fugal.net/linuxaudio/show/HomePage
>
> --
> Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
Curiously, shortly following the changing of the network card adapter which
brought the consortium Web server back up, the consortium lists are now back
as well. It appears that there is some kind of "umbilical cord" :-P that my
mental radar failed to notice between the two and therefore the listserve
has been for some reason bogged down due to network issues we've been
experiencing on the Web server (which is a rather curious thing since the
Web server has mail service disabled... go figure!).
Well, I am glad that got resolved, sort of :-)
Best wishes,
Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A.
Composition, Music Technology, CCTAD, and CHCI
Virginia Tech
Dept. of Music - 0240
Blacksburg, VA 24061
(540) 231-1137
(540) 231-5034 (fax)
ico(a)vt.edu
http://www.music.vt.edu/people/faculty/bukvic/
Apologies for the cross-posting -- the consortium listserv that is hosted by
Agnula server continues to refuse forwarding e-mail to its members...
Apropos CD covers for the vol.1, how about taking the image from the
http://lau.linuxaudio.org/faq/ ? IMHO it best portrays the idea of "Tux
Power" without even having to explicitly state the subtitle. So, we could
have the subtitle on the side and the back but perhaps not on the front side
of the cover? Or if we do have it on the front, perhaps making it
intentional small and inconspicuous?
Best wishes,
Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A.
Composition, Music Technology, CCTAD, and CHCI
Virginia Tech
Dept. of Music - 0240
Blacksburg, VA 24061
(540) 231-1137
(540) 231-5034 (fax)
ico(a)vt.edu
http://www.music.vt.edu/people/faculty/bukvic/
See:
http://lists.agnula.org/pipermail/consortium/2006-November/000781.html
BTW, anyone has any idea why the listserv is not forwarding posts to its
membership, yet it still adds new posts to the archive without any problems?
I checked the admin settings for the listserv and there is nothing that
would suggest any problems. Alas, I do not have ssh access to the listserv
server so I am unable to dig though the logs...
Very bizarre week to say the least. First the listserv breaks, and now the
linuxaudio.org server is experiencing problems as well...
Ico
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-audio-user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu [mailto:linux-audio-
> user-bounces(a)music.columbia.edu] On Behalf Of Geoff Beasley
> Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 9:00 PM
> To: linux-audio-user(a)music.columbia.edu
> Subject: [linux-audio-user] where are the "made in linux "logo's now ?
>
> can't find them anywhere
>
> g.
Just to let everyone know, we are experiencing some problems with the
Linuxaudio.org server. As a result, we will have a downtime over the weekend
and possibly a good portion of Monday.
My sincere apologies if this unfortunate development has caused you any
inconvenience. Your patience and understanding in this matter is most
appreciated!
Should you happen to have any additional questions and/or concerns, please
do not hesitate to contact me.
Best wishes,
Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A.
Composition, Music Technology, CCTAD, and CHCI
Virginia Tech
Dept. of Music - 0240
Blacksburg, VA 24061
(540) 231-1137
(540) 231-5034 (fax)
ico(a)vt.edu
http://www.music.vt.edu/people/faculty/bukvic/
Hello all,
Since I'm preparing to move abroad, I've transferred my website
to a host that's independent of my local ISP. The new site is
www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio
'Kokkini Zita' means 'red zeta' - the Greek letter, and all
the 'i' are pronounced as English 'ee', not 'y'.
It's also my 'project name' at the Linux Audio Consortium.
In time you will also see the red zeta appear in the GUI
of any new software.
The main page has been restyled a bit, and the rest will
follow as I have time. Please let me know if you have any
problems with the new layout and colors.
The old site will remain on-line for some months, but any
new stuff and updates will go to the new one only.
My new e-mail address will be fons-at-kokkinizita.net,
but please don't use that until you see it appear on
the lists.
Enjoy !
--
FA
Lascia la spina, cogli la rosa.
hi everyone!
i'm very happy to announce that marc-olivier barre will be maintaining
the linux-audio-* lists from now on.
let me take this opportunity to ask for a few more volunteers to
moderate linux-audio-announce. get this: for years, brilliant minds like
ingo molnar, robert love and lee revellhave been toiling with the kernel
for a few measly microseconds gain - as a linux-audio-announce
moderator, you can cut latencies by hours if not days. how is that for a
claim to fame? please get in touch with marc-olivier.
it's been a pleasure to participate in this linux audio community for
all those years, and i have profited immensely from the great work done
here! thanks everyone, and i hope to see you around at LAC 2007!
best wishes,
jörn
--
jörn nettingsmeier
home://germany/45128 essen/lortzingstr. 11/
http://spunk.dnsalias.org
phone://+49/201/491621
if you are a free (as in "free speech") software developer
and you happen to be travelling near my home, drop me a line
and come round for a free (as in "free beer") beer. :-D
On Saturday 11 November 2006 21:00, Tony Nelson wrote:
>At 4:21 PM -0500 11/11/06, Gene Heskett wrote:
> ...
>
This thread might be of interest to the linux-audio-dev group, so I've
added them to the Cc:
>>Yup, and its been a constant src of amazement to this old fart that
>> when the midi spec was setup, they used a serial port, thats fine, but
>> when they set the data rate at only 31,250 baud, ...
>>
>>Consistently attrocious timeing, with the horns always 1/16 beat late
>>unless the actual output order of each instrument is scrambled in the
>>order output. That would make it sound a heck of a lot less
>> mechanical. And there isn't a heck of a lot that can be done until we
>> put midi on an optical circuit running at several megabytes/sec.
>> Something like TOS maybe?
>
>Firewire. Many products already, plenty of speed, almost robust enough.
>1/8 millisecond isoch cycle times; each cycle can contain packets from
> many senders; each packet can contain lots of notes.
More robust IMO than the din connectors now used for midi interconnects,
however the cabling itself can't help but be more fragile when subjected
to the rigors of a jam session with bodies walking on them all night.
And that has to be a consideration else the first users will get
discouraged at the high cable failure rates and revert, particularly if
they have a tin ear and can't hear what to many of us would be an
extremely obvious improvement.
But I like that idea, a lot. Maybe some enterprising LAD people could get
together and spec something like a midi interface running over firewire,
complete with the repeaters so it can be daisy-chained just like midi can
be, and hopefully release it into the PD as a new midi-2 interface
standard. And design it such that it never, ever gets into the snails
trail of the 31,250 baud interface it uses today.
--
Cheers, Gene