Linux-audio-dev

linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org

2 participants
7534 discussions

by Paul Davis

Due to some untracked issues, 0.9beta20 was released in a form that prevents it from offering any MIDI I/O or MIDI configuration. In the time it took to discover that, other work had already happened that is fairly important, so we bring you an unintended extra release. http://ardour.org/releases/ardour-0.9beta21.tar.bz2 Changes ------- * MIDI support now configured and built * use Steve Harris' new libgdither code for dithering * new patch from Nick Mainsbridge for multi-region cross-track dragging * increase size of Session event pool (to aid with loading large sessions) * use "in 1" or "out 1" if a named connection cannot be found (e.g. when switching from a multichannel to a stereo audio interface) * patch for RPM building from Thac * libardour: 0.838.0 ardour/gtk: 0.536.1

21 years, 3 months

Re: [linux-audio-user] Re: [linux-audio-dev] How to automate hdsploader

by ico＠fuse.net

Thanks a lot for the help Paul! One more quick question though, has the issue with jackd + alsa + hdsp ever been fixed where jackd only allows 2 periods and no other number? Best wishes, Ico >Hence, I've been wondering what do I need to do to automate hdsploader as soon > as the cardbus has been connected? using the new modprobe.conf syntax .... install snd-hdsp /sbin/modprobe --first-time --ignore-install snd-hdsp && { /usr/bin/hdsploader; }

21 years, 3 months

[linux-audio-dev] Linux and Standards

by Ivica Ico Bukvic

Hi all, As some of you may already know, I am going to present a paper/demo at the upcoming ICMC 2004 conference in Miami on Linux titled: Linux as a Mature Digital Audio Workstation in Academic Electroacoustic Studios – Is Linux Ready for Prime Time? As promised I will be posting an expanded version of the paper online right after the presentation that is slated for the Wednesday next week. I would like to use this opportunity to thank all the members of this wonderful community for their insight and help in making my final paper as accurate and objective as possible. Furthermore, I would like to thank everyone involved in the development of audio software for the GNU/Linux platform because without you none of this would've been possible. Finally, just a couple days ago I was invited to serve as one of the panel members on Matthew Wright's discussion titled "Standards From the Computer Music Community" that will take place on Saturday November, 6. He wants me to present the Linux audio community's angle on standards and considering that this conference encompasses faculty as well as researchers and programmers from all across the World, I feel that this is a perfect opportunity to voice out our angle on the given topic and perhaps that way further expose the strengths that Linux can offer. I would like to share with you a short overview of my thoughts on this issue and would like to encourage those of you who may have additional thoughts to please send me your suggestions and/or corrections. Your help in this matter is most appreciated! However, please bear in mind due to fact that I am leaving for the conference on Sunday afternoon and am not sure how regularly (if at all) will I be able to check my e-mail while away from home, I would really appreciate it if you would please send me your responses before Sunday 2pm or so. I would of course appreciate also belated comments just in the case I do get to check my e-mail, I just cannot guarantee I'll get to read them prior to the presentation. My sincere apologies for the unusually short window of opportunity. At any rate, here's my blurb: ---------------------------------------- My initial presentation will be limited to 5-7 minutes since panel will consist of a number of members. Following everyone's initial presentation, there will be a discussion driven in part by the questions from the audience. LINUX AS A STANDARD I feel that considering linux as a standard is on one hand a kind of a paradox as it is built on the premise that individual truly can tweak it to heart's content and therefore it is relatively unlikely that any two Linux boxes would look and/or perform the same. Yet, on the flip-side of the coin Linux stands as a most successful offspring of the GNU movement and as such it is the most revolutionary and therefore the standard-setting OS in a category where it has no competition. Furthermore, this diversity it offers perhaps stands in its own light as a kind of a standard offering the end-user to shape their computer as a personalized instrument. PLANET CCRMA/DeMuDi/THAC'S RPMS/AUDIOSLACK The diversity seemingly suggests lack of standards, yet the software packages in most cases seamlessly compile on various distributions. This diversity is simply a byproduct of the diversity of the commercial Linux distributions. This is where lies perhaps the biggest problem with Linux, and that is the issue of different file tree across the different distributions which introduces hurdles for the "compile-from-the-source" crowd and in part feeds the demand for the prebuilt distros and subsequent fragmentation (a vicious circle if you like). KERNELS There is no "standard" audio kernel even though some of the kernel releases in conjunction with patches yield better performance. This diversity is however irrelevant as most of the applications work just fine on different sub-versions of the same kernel without a recompile. Therefore such disparity is more of a nuisance for the end-user than a potential standard-breaking anomaly. Furthermore the fix for such disparity is provided via aforementioned distributions. APPLICATIONS The powerful thing about Linux is that while everyone is welcome to contribute their own ideas or even design their own applications from ground-up, the strongest concepts rather than most developed applications are the ones who set the standard (i.e. JACK, ALSA, etc.) which is not always the case with the commercial proprietary World where often PR plays a critical role (i.e. VHS vs. BETAMAX -- although this is not the best example as this is not software-related but you get my point). Eventually, the strongest concepts do become also the most developed ones, but due to the fact that the source is readily available and that other developers choose to implement and therefore support those interfaces which look most promising, should there ever a new standard arise it will always have the chance to rise and overcome the leading standard, no matter how well the leading standard is established, and will likely do so in a least painful fashion for the end-user (i.e. ALSA vs. OSS as opposed to OS9 vs. OSX transition). Finally, open-source nature of the software minimizes the potential for misrepresentation of the format's features (a.k.a. false advertising in the commercial world). This is where Linux truly shines. That being said, Linux has its own share of disparate formats which impede the development of a standard (i.e. every sequencing software has a different format for saving the sessions). However, it is my feeling that this is simply a transitional phase and in due time the strongest will prevail. As far as the standard or core applications of the Linux community are concerned, I really do not wish to go there as that may spawn heated discussion which may completely detract from my goals. Besides, it is exactly this individualized preference that drives the diversity in Linux's software offering. AUDIO-RELATED STANDARDS THAT CAME FROM LINUX COMMUNITY (in no particular order -- it's 3am, give me a break ;-) Jack, LADSPA, LASH, ALSA, Ogg/Vorbis, others? (Lash is especially interesting as it is designed to unite seemingly different standards under one umbrella session controlling mechanism which is something unique for the Linux platform -- other proprietary formats are imho harder to unite under such a meta-standard, if you like, because they are often conceived to work just by themselves and do not necessarily encourage efforts from various competitive companies to conform to them; they rather come up with their own standard unless the existing standard is too strong to compete with which in either case results in a less adequate solution for the end-user) What is both interesting and in part detrimental (at least in short-term) to the Linux audio community is that many formats due to their openness are not readily supported by the proprietary world as they have no profit-making value (i.e. Apple's DRM-ed AAC is safeguarded by Apple so that they can profit from licensing it to other companies and/or locking in their iTunes/iPod market). One final remark on Linux standards as a whole is that Linux holds an upper hand when it comes to longevity of their standards as they are not encumbered by the IP limitations imposed by a particular company and therefore directly dependant on the company's longevity. ---------------------------------------- Sorry for the messy spill of thoughts, hopefully you'll get the main points of my ideas. I am just too tired at this point to try to clean-up my prose. I would really appreciate your thoughts as well as any potential additions you may have. Many thanks! Best wishes, Ivica Ico Bukvic, composer & multimedia sculptor http://meowing.ccm.uc.edu/~ico/ --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.784 / Virus Database: 530 - Release Date: 10/27/2004

21 years, 3 months

[linux-audio-dev] gtkmeter and threads?

by Dan Mills

Hi all, I am working on a project that makes very heavy use of the gtkmeter code (borrowed from JAMIN), and seem to have a hard to track down problem.... I am using jack so there are a few threads involved and the meters are updated from a g_timeout_add timer callback, the update_meters function is protected by gdk_threads_enter/leave. The problem is that in spite of this I still sometimes get the GUI locking up. There are no locks shared between the GUI and the DSP code and when this happens the DSP continues to run just fine. I remember a CVS version of JAMIN used to do something similar? Does anyone here remember what the cure was, it might give me some hints.... Regards, Dan.

21 years, 3 months

Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux and Standards

by lazzaro

On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 03:23:04AM -0400, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: > AUDIO-RELATED STANDARDS THAT CAME FROM LINUX COMMUNITY (in no > particular > order -- it's 3am, give me a break ;-) > Jack, LADSPA, LASH, ALSA, Ogg/Vorbis, others? RTP MIDI was prototyped on Linux (sfront). And while I'm pretty sure Eric Scheirer prototyped saolc (MPEG 4 Structured Audio) on SGI IRIS, a lot of the late-stage debugging and Corrigenda changes were done as part of sfront. Although, in the interest of full disclosure, I switched my desktop to OS X a few years ago, so at this point its fair to say the reference platform going forward for sfront-related standards work is OS X ... although if I had enough energy to maintain two desktops I'd make the second one Linux :-). --- John Lazzaro http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~lazzaro lazzaro [at] cs [dot] berkeley [dot] edu ---

21 years, 3 months

[linux-audio-dev] How to automate hdsploader on 2.6 kernel?

by ico＠fuse.net

Hi all, In the light of my upcoming presentation at ICMC, I am wondering whether it is possible to somehow automatically start hdsploader as soon as the snd-hdsp cardbus has been connected? I tried adding the snd-hdsp executable shellscript to the /etc/hotplug/pci folder but that apparently did absolutely nothing and since there is no suggested syntax for the pci.usermap file (at least not under the mandrake), I have no idea how to make hotplug aware of it. Furthermore, it seems that hotplug has very little or nothing to do with the cardbus as nowehere in the hotplug script do I find the syntax for this dmesg output: PCI: Enabling device 0000:02:00.0 (0080 -> 0082) ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:02:00.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17 Hammerfall-DSP: no Digiface or Multiface connected! card initialization pending : waiting for firmware Hence, I've been wondering what do I need to do to automate hdsploader as soon as the cardbus has been connected? I would greatly appreciate any help I can get! Best wishes, Ico

21 years, 3 months

[linux-audio-dev] [ANN] realtime-lsm-0.8.3 beta test

by Jack O'Quin

The realtime Linux Security Module is an installable kernel module that enables realtime capabilities for any 2.6 kernel without needing to directly patch the kernel. It was originally written by Torben Hohn and Jack O'Quin, who make no warranty concerning the safety, security or even stability of your system when using it. It is provided under the provisions of the GPL. We are preparing a new version of this LSM for inclusion in an upcoming 2.6.x kernel version. Special thanks to Jody McIntyre and Chris Wright for many improvements to the LSM, and to Lee Revell for patiently shepherding it through the kernel patch acceptance process. No one *needs* to use this new version, the older ones work fine. But it would help for some of you to download a beta version and try it out. Two test files are available, use either one. The first is a tarball[1] for building stand-alone, like previous LSM releases. This version no longer supports kernels earlier than 2.6.4. The second is a patch[2] for the current (2.6.10-rc1-mm2) development kernel. This patch should apply cleanly against any recent kernel since 2.6.9-mm1, and should work with some earlier ones with a little fiddling. [1] http://www.joq.us/realtime/realtime-lsm-0.8.3.tar.gz [2] http://www.joq.us/realtime/linux-2.6.10-rc1-mm2-rt2.patch.gz There are some small changes to the user interface. (*) The `allcaps' option is no longer supported. It was an unnecessary security exposure to include in standard kernel sources. Consequently, you will not be able to use the `jackstart' command with this version, unless you are running a recent CVS version of JACK (>=0.99.2). There is really no need for `jackstart' with realtime-lsm, invoking `jackd' directly works fine. (*) Recent kernels (>=2.6.9-mm1) externalize module parameters in sysfs. With this feature, realtime-lsm options can be queried and set via files in /sys/module/realtime/parameters, each named after the corresponding parameter (any, gid, mlock). Please report directly to me (i.e. mostly off-list) any problems or successes you have with this version. Thanks, -- joq

21 years, 3 months

[linux-audio-dev] LilyPond 2.4 released - print music beautifully

by Han-Wen Nienhuys

Dear music enthusiasts, LilyPond version 2.4 was released today! LilyPond is a program for making beautiful music notation. It is open source/free software, and is available for all popular operating systems. It runs on most Unix flavors --including Linux and MacOS X-- and MS Windows. Use it for your music as well! With this release, LilyPond does not rely anymore on TeX to do titling and page layout, but distributes page breaks optimally by itself to produce evenly spaced pages, while respecting user specified turning points. The slur formatting code has been completely rewritten, and now yields classical engraving quality results for most cases. In addition, version 2.4 adds fret diagrams, a safe execution mode for webserver use, a further simplified input format, better typography for ledger lines, many bugfixes and a fully revised and updated manual. Grab it at http://lilypond.org A big thank-you goes out to our contributors: Carl Sorensen David Svoboda Guy Gascoigne-Piggford Heikki Junes Hendrik Maryns Kristof Bastiaensen Mats Bengtsson Michael Welsh Duggan Peter Lutek Werner Lemberg Also thanks to our bug-hunters: Antti Kaihola, Bertalan Fodor, Brian Clements, Christian Hitz, Christoph Ludwig, Christophe Papazian, Daniel Berjón Díez, Dave Phillips, David Bobroff, David Brandon, Doug Asherman, Ed Jackson, Heinz Stolba, Jefferson dos Santos Felix, Karl Hammar, Marco Gusy, Martin Norbäck, Matthias Neeracher, Maurizio Tomasi, Michael Kiermaier, Pascal Legris, Peter Rosenbeck, Russ Ross, Stephen Pollei, Thomas Scharlowski, Will Oram, Yuval Harel, Happy music printing, The LilyPond development team, Han-Wen Nienhuys & Jan Nieuwenhuizen Core development Graham Percival Documentation Editor Erik Sandberg Bugmeister Pedro Kroeger Build meister -- Han-Wen Nienhuys | hanwen(a)xs4all.nl | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen

21 years, 3 months

[linux-audio-dev] Call for Participation: ICMC 2005

by Pau Arumi

apologies for crossposting) ------------------------------------------------------------ ICMC 2005 -- Free Sound International Computer Music Conference September 5-9, 2005. Barcelona, Spain http://www.icmc2005.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY OF DEADLINES Music, video, and installations -- February 5, 2005 Papers, posters, and demonstrations -- March 5, 2005 Panels, workshops and special events -- April 5th, 2005 Exhibitors -- June 5th, 2005 CALL FOR PARTICIPATION The Phonos Foundation, the Pompeu Fabra University of Barcelona, and the Higher School of Music of Catalonia in conjunction with the International Computer Music Association, is proud to announce ICMC 2005. The conference will take place in Barcelona, Spain, from the 5th to 9th of September 2005, with pre-conference workshops on September 1st and 2nd. ICMC is the pre-eminent annual gathering of computer music practitioners from around the world. Its unique interleaving of professional paper presentations and concerts of new computer music compositions creates a vital synthesis of science, technology, and the art of music. By choosing 'free sound' as this year's leitmotif, we aim to emphasise the idea of freeing sound from its current aesthetic, technical and legal confines. We wish to promote an open discussion on the extent to which sound is considered a community asset -- an asset that belongs to society and cannot be privatised. Thus, we encourage contributions that emphasise these and related topics. We invite original contributions in all areas of the computer music field in a number of formats. However, we are also open to any proposal, and encourage all submissions, including those that do not fit the categories below. We issue the following calls: * Call for music, video, and installations (deadline February 5, 2005) We invite submissions of electroacoustic music, video, and installation works that reflect the diversity of the field. Opportunities exist to combine digital resources with a variety of instrumental ensembles. For further details visit http://www.icmc2005.org/index.php?selectedPage=76 * Call for papers, posters, and demonstrations (deadline March 5, 2005) We invite submissions for papers, posters, and demonstrations examining the aesthetic, compositional, educational, musicological, scientific, or technological aspects of computer music and digital audio. For further information visit http://www.icmc2005.org/index.php?selectedPage=73 * Call for panels, workshops and special events (deadline April 5th, 2005) We invite proposals for panel sessions, workshops and special events, especially those with relevance to the conference theme of 'free sound'. * Call for exhibitors (deadline June 5th, 2005) The conference will provide a forum for the world's leading music technology companies to showcase their latest product information and for schools and institutions to highlight their educational programs. We invite submissions from interested parties. To promote the idea of 'free sound', the organisers of ICMC 2005 are setting up the Free Sound Project, a website dedicated to the sharing and usage of copyleft [1] sounds. Thus, we are making a special call for copyleft sounds with no specific deadline. For more information, visit http://www.icmc2005.org/ in the near future. For detailed information on the conference, and submission formats, visit http://www.icmc2005.org/ To keep up to date with all of the latest news and information about ICMC 2005 please subscribe to our mailing list by visiting http://www.icmc2005.org/index.php?selectedPage=64 We are looking forward to your contributions! The ICMC 2005 Team --- [1] http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/copyleft.html

21 years, 3 months

[linux-audio-dev] Linux soundapps site updated

by Dave Phillips

Greetings: The latest edition is on-line at these fine URLs: http://linux-sound.org (USA) http://linuxsound.atnet.at (Europe) http://linuxsound.jp (Japan) This update will be the last I'll do for a while, probably until sometime next year. Sorry, I just have too much going on right now. Best regards, Dave Phillips

21 years, 3 months

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

Linux-audio-dev