Hello all,
The zita-convolver library has been updated to 4.0.0.
This is a major version change, and there are some
(small) API changes. See the README for details.
Jconvolver has been updated for the new library
Nothing much new here, except that you can now set
the Jack client name in the config files.
As always:
<http://kokkinizita.linuxaudio.org/linuxaudio/downloads/index.html>
The new zita-convolver library is also a requirement
for zita-jacktools (to be presented at the LAC), which
will be available tomorrow.
Ciao,
--
FA
Hi LADs,
I was contacted earlier today by GitHub with a DCMA request from
Steinberg.net to remove the aeffectx.h from VeSTige. [1]
I am planning to contest the DCMA request. This will ideally happen with
some legal counsel and support from Javier Serrano Polo who is the
original (C) holder of the VeSTige header and reverse engineered the API.
Since Github requires action within 24 hours, I have meanwhile complied
and force-pushed
https://github.com/x42/lv2vst/blob/master/include/aeffectx.h out of
existence.
I have no idea why Steinberg would target this rather low profile
project, but there you go.
Cheers!
robin
[1] Search the web for
"aeffectx.h - simple header to allow VeSTige compilation and eventually
work"
and you will find the exact file in various places.
In case you're wondering how a github DCMA notice looks like:
- - -
**Are you the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright
owner’s behalf?**
Yes
**Please provide a detailed description of the original copyrighted work
that has allegedly been infringed. If possible, include a URL to where
it is posted online.**
https://www.steinberg.net/en/company/developers.html
**What files should be taken down? Please provide URLs for each file, or
if the entire repository, the repository’s URL:**
https://github.com/x42/lv2vst/blob/master/include/aeffectx.h
**Have you searched for any forks of the allegedly infringing files or
repositories? Each fork is a distinct repository and must be identified
separately if you believe it is infringing and wish to have it taken
down.**
no
**Is the work licensed under an open source license? If so, which open
source license? Are the allegedly infringing files being used under the
open source license, or are they in violation of the license?**
no
**What would be the best solution for the alleged infringement? Are
there specific changes the other person can make other than removal?**
no
**Do you have the alleged infringer’s contact information? If so, please
provide it:**
**Type (or copy and paste) the following statement: "I have a good faith
belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above on the
infringing web pages is not authorized by the copyright owner, or its
agent, or the law. I have taken fair use into consideration."**
"I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials
described above on the infringing web pages is not authorized by the
copyright owner, or its agent, or the law. I have taken fair use into
consideration."
**Type (or copy and paste) the following statement: "I swear, under
penalty of perjury, that the information in this notification is
accurate and that I am the copyright owner, or am authorized to act on
behalf of the owner, of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed."**
"I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in this
notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner, or am
authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of an exclusive right that is
allegedly infringed."
**Please confirm that you have you have read our Guide to Submitting a
DMCA Takedown Notice:
https://help.github.com/articles/guide-to-submitting-a-dmca-takedown-notice…
yes i confirm
**So that we can get back to you, please provide either your telephone
number or physical address:**
[private]
[private] Phone: [private]
Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH Fax : [private]
[private]
http://www.steinberg.net
**Please type your full legal name below to sign this request:**
[private]
Hello.
Recently, I have taken the task of updating and maintaining the old
audio plugin HybridReverb2 which is programmed with the Juce framework.
A LinuxMAO community member has pointed to me some info about recent
Juce, more specifically about its change of license. Is Juce still
compatible with libre software development like it used to be?
There is rumor about Juce becoming proprietary, which emanates from
some developers in a Carla thread.
https://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?t=17814#p87547
I don't see an element to truly substantiate this claim. Does anyone
know better about the whole Juce situation?
Thanks. -JPC
Dear all,
we're happy to announce (and you might have noticed already),
that the schedule for Linux Audio Conference 2018 is live!
https://lac.linuxaudio.org/2018/pages/schedule
Please note, that it will still be subject to slight changes!
We have prepared a registration form for attendees:
https://www.ak.tu-berlin.de/index.php?id=195758
Please sign up at your earliest convenience to let us know,
if you're part of the conference.
Also, we'd like to draw special attention to this year's keynote,
which will be held by Gianfranco Ceccolini of MOD Devices:
https://lac.linuxaudio.org/2018/pages/event/102/
Looking forward to seeing you in Berlin,
--
Linux Audio Conference team
On Wed Apr 25 18:27:25 CEST 2018 Will J Godfrey wrote:
> I use one machine specifically for music, permanently connected to Keyboards
> etc. and PA was removed with extreme prejudice. On the audio side it's working
> entirely Jack - MIDI is mostly ALSA.
>
> On my other 'office' machine it's there and I don't pay any attention to it.
I also use dedicated machines for my DAW systems, with no PA installed. All
audio is working with jack.
My DAWs seldom connect to the internet so I don't have a heavyweight web
browser (or many other desktop-type programs for that matter) installed.
I actually dislike modern desktop Linux so much I switched my 'office'
system to OpenBSD some time ago. That uses sndio (much simpler than PA)
for browser audio.
John