Greetings:
Yes, it's true, I've finally updated the sites with a new edition for
your weekend browsing pleasure. If you don't already know the drill, you
can follow these links to the goods:
http://linux-sound.org (USA)
http://www.linuxsound.at (Europe)
http://linuxsound.jp (Japan)
Have fun !
Best regards,
Dave Phillips
I read:
> soon we will see network operators starring at contemporary music festivals.
actually sonification of traffic is already passe, you probably should have
attended some of the festivals ;)
regards,
x
--
chris(a)lo-res.org Postmodernism is german romanticism with better
http://pilot.fm/ special effects. (Jeff Keuss / via ctheory.com)
Hello !
I've read somewhere that it is not possible that threads write different data to /dev/dsp.
But how does Cheesetracker, for example, make it then?
Sascha Retzki
__________________________________________________
Verpassen Sie keine eBay-Auktion und bieten Sie bequem
und schnell über das Telefon mit http://www.telefonbieten.de
Ihre eMails auf dem Handy lesen - ohne Zeitverlust - 24h/Tag
eMail, FAX, SMS, VoiceMail mit http://www.directbox.com
i was fooling around with gimp when a thing like this appeared on the
screen...
http://rclug.linux.it/ladspa.png
do you like it? i thought that was a cool logo for ladspa plugins,
instead of the blurred green/blue text...
wil
---
"If you have to ask what jazz is, you'll never know."
-- Louis Armstrong.
Mannr(a)uwaterloo.ca wrote:
> Does the M-audio MobilePre work with Linux?
No.
> Earlier there was a 'beta' released (by Clemens Ladisch):
It doesn't work. I think there is a bug in the USB subsystem in the
kernel, but I don't have time to research further now.
Currently, these devices don't work with Linux at all.
> I am also considering the Tascam US-122 as an alternate,
This one isn't fully compatible with the USB Audio specification,
either. I'm not sure if the special driver supports all features.
HTH
Clemens
Hi,
(Jack O'Quin got me thinking about rt_monitor again - thanks!)
This is an alternative to capabilities / SCHED_SOFTRR...
I use my old rt_monitor
* protects the system on RT overload
* performs the actual setting of scheduler type
* it does not even have to be visible for lusers!
My old testprogram RT has been converted to
a library fit for preloading.
It works like this.
As root start
# rt_monitor
As normal user start latencytest
$ ./rts path/to/latencytest none 2 128 10
rts has two options
-i do not raise the priority.
-v be more verbose.
* It does also limit the effective min/max range.
Do also try (don't try this as root unless rt_monitor is running)
$ ./rts path/to/latencytest none 2 1024 99
* In this case rt_monitor captures the process and renices it.
(SCHED_OTHER + nice)
BUGS:
* better build and installation system
* could ignore RT processes already running when rt_monitor starts
* rt_monitor functionallity has not been reverified...
* it can't lock memory :-( No PIDs in calls.
* code that checks uid before using the redefined functions won't work
(I have an modified latencytest)
* client get stuck if there is no monitor running.
/RogerL
--
Roger Larsson
Skellefteå
Sweden
Paul Davis:
> >I guess this will be of interest to some of you...
> >An even newer version has shown up on linux-kernel.
>
> its not clear how useful this really is. we know that the disk i/o
> system can't keep up with realtime needs by definition - there has to
> be a significant buffer between the disk and the RT audio thread. i'd
> be suprised if it really helps any actual apps, because they've
> already got this buffer in place, and the buffer hides the lack of
> dedicated resource allocation on the part of the kernel.
>
Perhaps it would help programs that does everything inside one process,
like snd.
--
Excellent plan.
Maybe I could contribute, since I was thinking along the same lines as well.
My performance system is a pd pattern sequencer triggering csound, also geared
to my personal setup, and I have been thinking on moving it to C as well.
Parts are already coded in C as a pd external.
Gerard
On Thursday 13 November 2003 11:39, ian duncan wrote:
> Well I'm actually making more of toolkit for do it yourself modular live
> sequencing systems. So the idea is that one might use parts of it on PC,
> port parts to Pic chips, or run parts coded in something like Csound or PD.
> At the moment the whole thing is a gigantic Csound ensemble heavily
> tailored around my own personal gear set up, so I haven't had to worry
> about any low level stuff yet. But I would like to start modularizing it
> and making it available to other people and platforms. It works well in
> Csound, but file i/o is kluderific so I'd like to get that kind of stuff
> going in C as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Iain
>
>
--
electronic & acoustic musics-- http://www.xs4all.nl/~gml
Mammut will FFT your sound in one single gigantic analysis (no windows).
These spectral data, where the development in time is incorporated in
mysterious ways, may then be transformed by different algorithms prior to
resynthesis. An interesting aspect of Mammut is its completely
non-intuitive sound transformation approach.
0.15 -> 0.16
-Tiny source cleanup.
-Upgraded the included sndlib i386-binary to latest version. This
one includes jack-support.
http://www.notam02.no/arkiv/src/
--