On 09/15/2016 03:33 PM, Rui Nuno Capela wrote:
> On 09/15/2016 11:58 AM, Daniel Swärd wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Now that Ableton Link has been publically released as GPL, does anyone
>> have any ideas/plans to integrate it into your projects?
>>
>> http://ableton.github.io/link/
>>
>
> i do (qtractor)
>
hmm..
been trying converting the linkhut example to jack and ...
it plays well, links well with peers over the W/LAN, but dang it does
draw upwards any cpu load chart over here :/~
who's willing to try this?
here's my (early) test code:
(please note that it includes the needed ableton::Link stuff verbatim):
http:/www.rncbc.org/datahub/ableton-link-jack-1.tar.gz
nb. you also need asio-dev(el) installed (http://think-async.com/)
cheers
--
rncbc aka. Rui Nuno Capela
On my UbuntuStudio 16.04 (4.4.0-36-lowlatency) the streaming interfaces
(16xin & 8xout) works perfect with the stock driver / JACK.
The intention of my custom snd-usb-audio is to offer the build-in DSP
features of the US-16x08.
So I didn't made changes to the streaming interfaces but added some mixer
quirks to the stock driver.
Add. I did coded a custom mixer application (QT5) to control the EQ and
compressor function via those new mixer interfaces.
ranokio wrote
> With JAck capture only works fine on Playback only mode, I have 8
> independent neat outputs
If you have problems with the streaming interfaces, I guess my driver wont
help you.
You may investigate the diff-file based on my changes in Ubuntu 16.04 which
you'll find here <http://www.paraair.de/snd-usb-audio/us16x08.diff> .
Note! Because I'd never investigate Fedora sources, I assume you should NOT
apply the patch to your kernel source directly.
Greets
Detlef
--
View this message in context: http://linux-audio.4202.n7.nabble.com/Tascam-US-16x08-0644-8047-tp96678p101…
Sent from the linux-audio-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi.
Now that Ableton Link has been publically released as GPL, does anyone
have any ideas/plans to integrate it into your projects?
http://ableton.github.io/link/
/Daniel
System: Ubuntu Mate 14.04.
Hi, there. With some problems that I could resolve, I compiled with success:
- zita-resampler-1.3.0
- zita-njbridge-0.1.1
I did this in two computers. Now, in one computer, I run zita-j2n with
success. In Patchage, I can see the Jack server, it is there. I connect
PureData to it.
Now, in the other computer, I try to run zita-n2j and it says:
/mario@circo3d:~$ zita-j2n --jname zita --chan 2 192.168.1.41 8800//
//Cannot read socket fd = 6 err = Success//
//CheckRes error//
//JackSocketClientChannel read fail//
//Fatal error condition, terminating.//
//Server is not running//
//Server is not running//
/
... but Jack is running. I use QjackCtl, but I tried with jackd from
command line and it tells me the same error.
In this computer, zita-n2j runs well.
What's happening with zita-j2n?
Is Kokkini Zita in this list?
Thanks in advance.
For some days, I'm testing some ways to send/receive audio to/from two
computers connected with WiFi to a router. I use Jack in both machines
and I need to use WiFi, no wires, because of a necessarily comfort issue.
What I tested:
- netsend~/netreceive~ from http://www.nullmedium.de/dev/netsend~/. It
works, but it makes a lot of click/pops: unacceptable.
- I compiled zita-njbridge and, finally, I made it work: also
unaceptable because of similar noises and silences.
What I didn't test yet:
- netsend~/netreceive~ from http://www.remu.fr/sound-delta/netsend~/,
because it is not compiled for Linux and I don't know how to do it.
- I tried to use jack.trip but, because an error, I should compile 1.1
version. I didn't do it, because I have to install Qt5. I'm afraid of
doing a mess...
- NetJack1: I like the idea of compressing audio, but I don't like the
master-slave design because I have to use both soundcards speakers and
microphones.
- NetJack2: also it has master-slave system. I don't know if I will can
make the configuration I need.
Also, I have to send from one computer to the other, a screencast (I
would use VNC or "X over SSH", I have to test them). It doesn't matter
if it is not perfect, it is only for monitoring.
Now, the question: *Will I can get what I need? Will I can send audio
to/from both computers with no clicks/pops/silences and also send video
from one to another?
*If the answer is "NO", I'm ending right here my research.
Thanks in advance.
Hello,
Here is a new "album" made with LMMS:
https://www.jamendo.com/album/160826/extreme-limite-de-la-sagesse
I used version 1.1.3 with some patches to enable the Carla rack under LMMS.
I used samples from:
- https://archive.org/
- http://freesound.org/
- http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Free_sound_samples (percussion samples)
I feel LMMS is a great tool to play with sounds and I am glad to see
that there are still some work done for a new release ...
There are some encoding problem on Jamendo. I send them several messages
to highlight these problems, but still no answer. So, if the sound feel
a little bit strange from time to time, it's maybe a jamendo problem (or
this is maybe due to the song :) ).
Best regards,
Yann
Hi!
I'm currently implementing a LV2 plugin for SpectMorph, and so far I only
defined one audio port in the ttl file/source, as the output of the morphing
algorithm is just mono.
I have tested with Ardour and Qtractor. Ardour does what I'd expect: it plays
my instrument output on both channels. Qtractor however just plays my mono data
on one channel, the other is silent. Which is not what I want.
So I am considering making my LV2 instrument always stereo, and just copy the
output buffer from left to right - this is cheap, and probably not much more
expensive than what the host would need to do anyway.
Does this sound like the reasonable way to go?
Cu... Stefan
--
Stefan Westerfeld, http://space.twc.de/~stefan
Hi,
I think I need some advice about portability. I haven't been doing any
programming for years on audio so I'm fairly rusty. My son is about to
start a programming project (C++) in school (secondary school). It's
about active noise reduction/cancellation. The program will be used on
both Windows and Linux. Is Portaudio the best choice for portability or
is there some other option that might be better?
regards,
--
/bengan
I'm finding quite a lot of occasions where variables defined as 'bool' are
sometimes being set with true or false and other times 0 or 1. On one occasion
there is something like x = n + {boolean variable}
This last one seems quite unsafe to me as I didn't think the actual value of
true and false was guaranteed.
Am I being overly cautious or should I change them all to one form or the other?
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song.
