22 Aug
2014
22 Aug
'14
1:03 p.m.
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 08:41 +0100, John Rigg wrote:
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 01:10:58AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Good point. It still doesn't matter what tapper is used, since both
kinds don't cause issues.
On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 12:32 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu,
2014-08-21 at 20:06 +0100, John Rigg wrote:
True, but how much more does it cost to emulate a P+G fader in software
compared with the cheaper ones? The P+G faders (generally regarded as the best)
Actually you get fader units for Studer with P&G, but also with Alps
faders. Such a module usually costs more than a complete home recording
mixer. On Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:29:30 +0200, John Rigg
<ladev8(a)jrigg.co.uk> wrote:
^^^ recordings :D, not "mix"
Ralf, please stop dictating how others should
work. I've been recording
in studios for 35 years and I like to think I know what I'm doing. Not
everyone who has different working methods from yours is an idiot, but
that seems to be what you are implying.
Hi John,
you claimed that you know how to record right in the first place, so that
you don't need EQs for the mixing, that's why you claimed that EQs by
default for each mixer channel could be a nuisance. You might have the
gift to know how the frequencies will interact for the mix, already when
doing the mix, but that is a very unusual gift. It's common for good audio