Re: [LAD] Fwd: Fw: Re: At the hands of Professor Keller and Raymond

On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 00:04 -0400, laseray(a)gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 23:18:03 David Robillard wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 23:01 -0400, laseray(a)gmail.com wrote: > > > On Tuesday 28 July 2009 22:38:03 David Robillard wrote: > > > > at revision 12, this project is (in my non-lawyer non-authoritative > > > > opinion, etc), very obviously and correctly licensed under the GPL > > > > version 2 or later, in the way recommended by the FSF. > > > > > > The raw code seems okay over there. Running ant to make a dist > > > package results in something that violates the GPL if a user were > > > to distribute it. > > > > No, it does not, and even if it did, this would not be a GPL violation > > on Prof. Keller's part. > > Yes, it does. I just did it a little while ago. There is no license file > in it. I checked the dist/zip targets.