26 Jul
2006
26 Jul
'06
8:12 a.m.
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:07:13 +1000
Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la(a)mega-nerd.com> wrote:
> > My own rather feeble first attempt is here:
> >
> > http://www.mega-nerd.com/tmp/sndfile.hh
> >
> > but I am not a fan nor a great user of C++. The wrapper should
> > really be written by someone with a love for the language.
>
> I use C++ a lot, and I gotta say, this wrapper isn't bad at all. I
Well, it is very thin though. Which is not a bad thing at all. One could
make ue of an arbitrary amount of more advanced C++ features if desired
though (i.e. templates parametrized with the type you want to read for
example, or operator<< and operator>> for reading and writing, etc.)
prefer lower
case method names, but that's about it.
Oh, cool, a response at last :-).
Well first off, it isn't quite complete and it hasn't been
properly tested either.
Secondly, with regard to the method names, which do you prefer: - OpenRead
- openRead
- open_read
vote++, i never cared for the
more java style methodName convention.
- something else
Since you're the only person who actually responded to the real
meat of my email, I have to assume that you are the only person
on this list with a love for C++ and hence the only one who
should have any real input on this issue ;-).
Nicely worded :)
Flo
--
Palimm Palimm!
http://tapas.affenbande.org