4 Feb
2008
4 Feb
'08
6:45 p.m.
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 22:23 +0200, Juuso Alasuutari wrote:
I'm assuming you meant to post this to the list,
Paul.
In reply to your comment:
One of the motives behind jack-dbus is that a JACK control application
shouldn't have to be RT capable since it's not processing any
realtime-sensitive data anyway. From a technical perspective, could
libjack be extended with such a non realtime control API?
there are many parts of the JACK API that are not RT-bound. in fact,
basically *all* of it except for a clients process() callback, which a
client is not required to register.