24 Sep
2003
24 Sep
'03
10:45 p.m.
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 19:25, Steve Harris wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 08:18:45PM +0200, Marco
Ballini wrote:
with "philosophy" I meant (sorry for
my english): designed to be an
"open" API. Maybe I'm wrong (and please correct me) but the the issues
regaurding future use and development of such an API are not only
related to the license but also with the design process.
Best regards
-Marco
On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 18:20, Paul Davis wrote:
Partly, but many of the contributors are Free Software people, and IIRC the
final SDK will be released under a Free Software friendly licence.
discussion about it moved to the GMPI list. GMPI
is an industry-wide
attempt to define a platform+vendor neutral music plugin API.
Does this mean that
the decision process is driven by commercial
interests. Are they developing an API with the same
philosophy of LADSPA?
No, we allready have a LADSPA, its intended to include events and other
things that are missing form LADSPA.