On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 02:28:03PM +0100, Chris Cannam wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, torbenh
<torbenh(a)gmx.de> wrote:
dunno. but wikipedia calls this particular style
modern c++
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_C%2B%2B_Design
Ah, I see. A neat trick, to give a still relatively esoteric idiom
such a progressive name. One can hardly say "oh no, I don't like to
write modern C++", can one?
i think you can.
but i really dont think its so esoteric.
the whole boost is using it.
and boost is where most of the potential STL additions are maturing.
--
torben Hohn