On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 11:07 +0200, Toby wrote:
Tim Goetze wrote:
I'm pretty much sold on Python as my
high-level language of choice and
very reluctant to diversify in computer language literacy any further.
I feel your pain. Python is by far my favorite language ever. However,
I've recently been looking for an alternative *compiled* object-oriented
language, because let's face it, Python is on average 10 times slower
than C. Sometimes you just can't afford it.
Enter Objective-C:
- STRICT SUPERSET OF C: every valid C program is a valid ObjC program.
This makes it trivial to include or link to C code and libraries and
to mix procedural, object-oriented and ASM code in the same *file*.
- SIMPLE: ObjC is plain C with one syntax addition and a few new
keywords. It only extends the C language to support Smalltalk-like
object-oriented features, because that's all you're going to need.
No more operator overloading, templates, references, 'const', etc.
- DYNAMICALLY TYPED: messages (method calls) are delivered according to
the dynamic type of the target object, not to some static type. This
is how Python works. You can even send an object a message that is
not specified in its interface. This might seem like a bad idea, but
instead it allows for powerful delegation-based design patterns.
- FAST: Objective-C performs dynamically bound message calls very
quickly, about 1.5-2.0 times as long as a plain C function call!
- UGLY INCONSITENT MESSAGE SYNTAX: An impessive feat in itself that
such a small number of additions to a language, while good in spirit,
can turn it into a complete mess of a mongrel only a mother could love.
:)
-DR-