13 Apr
2010
13 Apr
'10
2:40 a.m.
On Tuesday 13 April 2010 02:21:54 Jens M Andreasen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 00:55 +0100, James Morris wrote:
Or by doubling/tripling a part in the sequencer to get more volume in the
sound.
Of course this really should then be a second (and third) midi-channel, but if
the sound used allows it, I don't see a problem with this behaviour.
Have fun,
Arnold
A string of note-ons following each other all for
the same pitch n
without any intervening note-offs for pitch n, IS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE
provided they are INTENTIONAL and NOT accidental.
Yes, except for that this is an absurdity that could only happen by
accidental programming.