12 Sep
2008
12 Sep
'08
5:33 p.m.
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 12:14 -0700, Justin Smith wrote:
If you just did a simple phase inversion, you would
lose half of the
information you could be sending to the dac, you could easily use an
algorithm that sets things up so you have full bit resolution (ie.
double the rated resolution of a single channel).
So what it is the magic number then for improved resolution? At first I
thought intuitively: -3dB!
But now I am not so sure. I can't explain to an audiemce why -3 is a
better number than any other.